PLR 200618017: Spouse's timely disclaimer qualifies if valid under state law

Number
200618017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Disclaimers
Topics
Code sections
§ 2518, § 2046
Ruling dated
January 24, 2006
Publicly released
May 5, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A surviving spouse filed a disclaimer within nine months of the decedent's death. She refused interests in rental property, certificates of deposit, and half of several joint financial accounts, allowing the interests to pass to the decedent's stepchildren under his will. The spouse represented that she had contributed nothing to the accounts and had accepted no benefit from the disclaimed property. The IRS ruled that the disclaimer met section 2518's federal requirements if it was valid under state law. A qualified disclaimer treats the spouse as never having received those interests for federal estate and gift tax purposes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the spouse's disclaimer of inherited and joint account interests qualify under section 2518?
  • Outcome: Approved, provided the disclaimer is valid under state law.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2046, 2518; Treas. Reg. § 25.2518-2(c)(4)(iii).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200618017
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 5/5/2006
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 2518.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------
------------------------------, ID No. ------------
--------------------------------------
---------
-----------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
In Re: ---------- Ruling Request
CC:PSI:B09
-
PLR-157453-05
Date: January 24, 2006

Legend:

Decedent = ---------------------------
Spouse = ------------------------
Court = ---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
State Law 1 = -----------------------
Date 1 = -------------------------
Date 2 = ------------------

Dear ------------:

This is in response to your letter dated November 6, 2005, requesting a ruling on whether a disclaimer is a qualified disclaimer for purposes of § 2518 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The facts submitted and the representations made are as follows. Decedent died on Date 1 survived by his spouse (Spouse) and two stepchildren. Article Fifth of Decedent’s will provides that if Spouse predeceases Decedent, Decedent’s residuary estate is to be distributed to his two stepchildren.

Decedent’s residuary estate includes, among other assets, residential rental property (Property) owned by Decedent, two certificates of deposit (CDs) owned by Decedent, and four financial accounts (Financial Accounts) held as joint tenants with right of survivorship by Decedent and Spouse. It has been represented that Spouse did not contribute to the Property, the CDs, or the Financial Accounts during Decedent’s lifetime, nor did she accept any benefits of the Property, the CDs, or the Financial Accounts after Decedent’s death.

On Date 2 (within 9 months of Decedent’s death), Spouse filed a disclaimer with Court, disclaiming any interest she had under Decedent’s will in the Property and the CDs, and one-half of the Financial Accounts. Pursuant to the terms of the disclaimer and Article

PLR-157453-05
2

Fifth of the will the CDs and the Property and one-half of the Financial Accounts will pass to the two stepchildren.

You are requesting a ruling that the disclaimer Spouse filed on Date 2 is a qualified disclaimer within the meaning of § 2518(b).

Law and Analysis:

Section 2046 provides that disclaimers of property interests passing upon death are treated as provided in § 2518.

Section 2518(a) provides that, if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any interest in property, then for purposes of the estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes, the interest will be treated as if it had never been transferred to the disclaimant. Section 2518(b) defines the term "qualified disclaimer" to mean an irrevocable and unqualified refusal by a person to accept an interest in property but only if:

(1) such refusal is in writing;

(2) such writing is received by the transferor of the interest, the transferor's legal representative, or the holder of the legal title to the property to which the interest relates not later than the date which is 9 months after the later of the date on which the transfer creating the interest in such person is made, or the day on which such person attains age 21;

(3) such person has not accepted the interest or any of its benefits; and

(4) as a result of such refusal, the interest passes without any direction on the part of the person making the disclaimer and passes either to the spouse of the decedent, or to a person other than the person making the disclaimer.

Section 2518(c)(1) provides that a disclaimer with respect to an undivided portion of an interest which meets the requirements of the preceding sentence shall be treated as a qualified disclaimer of such portion of the interest.

Section 25.2518-2(c)(4)(iii) provides that in the case of a transfer to a joint bank, brokerage, or other investment account (e.g. an account held at a mutual fund), if a transferor may unilaterally regain the transferor’s own contributions to the account without the consent of the other cotenant, such that the transfer is not a completed gift under § 25.2511-1(h)(4), the transfer creating the survivor’s interest in the decedent’s share of the account occurs on the death of the deceased cotenant. Accordingly, if a surviving joint tenant desires to make a qualified disclaimer with respect to funds contributed by a deceased cotenant, the disclaimer must be made within 9 months of the cotenant’s death. The surviving joint tenant may not disclaim any portion of the joint

PLR-157453-05
3

account attributable to consideration furnished by the surviving joint tenant.

Under State Law 1, as a result of the disclaimer, Spouse will be treated as predeceasing Decedent with respect to the disclaimed interests.

In this case, it has been represented that Spouse did not contribute to any of the joint accounts being disclaimed and that Spouse has not accepted any benefit or interest in the property being disclaimed, including any income earned after Decedent’s death that is attributable to the disclaimed property. Therefore, based upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude, that if the disclaimer was valid under State law, the disclaimer was a qualified disclaimer under § 2518.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

Melissa C. Liquerman

Melissa C. Liquerman
Branch Chief, Branch 9
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosure: Copy for ' 6110 purposes.

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace