PLR 200617023: Extra time granted for dual consolidated loss filings

Number
200617023
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
January 23, 2006
Publicly released
April 28, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation had not properly filed several elections and annual certifications for dual consolidated losses from foreign branches and hybrid entities. Its outside tax firm missed filings for two years, and the corporation omitted filings when it prepared a later return in house. The IRS found that the corporation met the reasonable conduct and government prejudice standards for discretionary filing relief. It gave the corporation 60 days to submit the specified elections and certifications for the three years at issue. The extension did not establish that the corporation was otherwise eligible to make those filings.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation file late or corrected dual consolidated loss elections and certifications?
  • Outcome: Approved: 60 extra days for the filings identified in the ruling.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200617023
Release Date: 4/28/2006
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04

------------------------
Person To Contact:
-------------------------
----------------------, ID No. ---------------
----------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-----------------------------------
---------------------
-----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC: INTL – PLR-149578-04

  • Date: January 23, 2006

In Re: -----------------
-

Taxpayer = -------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entity 1 = -----------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entity 2 = --------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entity 3 = -------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entity 4 = -------------------------------------

Entity 5 = ----------------------------------

Entity 6 = -----------------------------------

Year 1 = --------------------------------------------------

Year 2 = ------------------------------------------------

Year 3 = ------------------------------------------------

CPA Firm = ---------

2

In re: PLR-149578-04

Amount aa = ---------

Amount bb = ---------

Amount cc = -----------------

Amount dd = -----------------

Amount ee = -----------------

Amount ff = --------------

Amount gg = -------------

Amount hh = -------------

Amount ii = -------------

Amount jj = -------------

Amount kk = -----------

Dear --------------------

This is in response to a letter dated September 14, 2004, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file elections under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(i) and annual certifications under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) for Year 1 through Year 3 with respect to dual consolidated losses attributable to the interests in Entities 1 through 6. Additional information was received in letters dated November 22, 2005 and January 10, 2005. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

Taxpayer engaged CPA Firm to prepare its consolidated federal tax returns for Year 1 and Year 2. CPA Firm was engaged to review the elections and certifications and to correct any omissions and deficiencies for all applicable tax years. CPA Firm failed to

3

In re: PLR-149578-04

advise Taxpayer of the need to file any elections or certifications with respect to dual consolidated losses attributable to certain foreign branches and interests in certain hybrid entity separate units. For Year 3, Taxpayer determined that the return would be prepared in house. Taxpayer inadvertently omitted elections and certifications required for Year 3.

The interest in Entity 1 is a hybrid entity separate unit as described in §1.1503-2(c)(4). Dual consolidated losses of Amount aa for Year 2 and Amount bb for Year 3 are attributable to the interest in Entity 1. An election was not filed for the Year 2 loss, and a certification with respect to the Year 2 loss was not filed with Taxpayer’s federal tax return for Year 3. In addition, an incorrect election was filed for the Year 3 loss.

The interest in Entity 2 is a hybrid entity separate unit as described in §1.1503-2(c)(4)., Dual consolidated losses of Amount cc for Year 1, Amount dd for Year 2, and Amount ee for Year 3, are attributable to the interest in Entity 2. An election was not filed for the Year 1 loss, and a certification with respect to the Year 1 loss was not filed with Taxpayer’s federal tax returns for Year 2 and Year 3. Likewise, an election was not filed for the Year 2 loss, and a certification with respect to the Year 2 loss was not filed with Taxpayer’s federal tax return for Year 3. An incorrect election was filed for the Year 3 loss.

The interest in Entity 3 is a hybrid entity separate unit as described in §1.1503-2(c)(4). Dual consolidated losses of Amount ff for Year 2 and Amount gg for Year 3 are attributable to the interest in Entity 3. An election was not filed for the Year 2 loss and a certification with respect to the Year 2 loss was not filed with Taxpayer’s federal tax return for Year 3. An election was not filed for the Year 3 loss.

Entity 4 is a foreign branch of Taxpayer and a separate unit described in §1.1503- 2(c)(3)(A). Dual consolidated losses of Amount hh for Year 1 and Amount ii for Year 2 were incurred by Entity 4. Elections were not filed for the Year 1 and Year 2 losses.

Entity 5 is a foreign branch of Taxpayer and a separate unit described in §1.1503- 2(c)(3)(A). Dual consolidated losses of Amount jj for Year 1 were incurred by Entity 5. An election was not filed for the Year 1 loss.

Entity 6 is a foreign branch of Taxpayer and a separate unit described in §1.1503- 2(c)(3)(A). Dual consolidated losses of Amount kk for Year 3 were incurred by Entity 6. An election was not filed for the Year 3 loss.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is

4

In re: PLR-149578-04

prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the filings described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2) are regulatory elections as defined in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the elections and the certifications for the dual consolidated losses described in this letter attributable to Entities 1 through 6 for Years 1 through 3.

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the election agreement and annual certification. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100- 1(a).

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the election agreements and the annual certifications that are the subject of this ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

5

In re: PLR-149578-04

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to Taxpayer’s authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

___
Robert W. Lorence
Senior Counsel
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International) Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

CC:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace