PLR 200617013: Four-building housing project may make late depreciation election

Number
200617013
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 168, § 42
Ruling dated
January 6, 2006
Publicly released
April 28, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A developer intended to use the alternative depreciation system for a four-building low-income rental housing project. Its tax opinion and financial projections assumed that method, but its return preparer inadvertently used a different depreciation period on the original return. The IRS concluded that the developer met the standards for discretionary election relief. It allowed the developer to make the section 168(g)(7) election for the property and directed it to send a copy of the ruling to the service center for attachment to an amended return. The ruling did not address other tax consequences.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the developer elect the alternative depreciation system after the property was placed in service?
  • Outcome: Approved: the developer may make the section 168(g)(7) election for the property.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 168(g)(7), 42(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200617013
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/28/2006
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------
---------------------
--------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B06
PLR-145315-05
-
Date:
January 06, 2006

Re: Request for Extension of Time to Elect the Alternative Depreciation System for Certain Real Property

Taxpayer = --------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Location = --------------------------
Year = -------
SB/SE Official = ---------------------------

Dear -----------:

This letter responds to a letter submitted August 9, 2005, requesting an extension of time pursuant to ' 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations for Taxpayer to make an election under § 168(g)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code to use the Alternative Depreciation System (ADS) for certain real property.

According to the information submitted, Taxpayer is the developer and owner of a four building, low-income rental housing project (the Property) located in Location. Construction was completed and the Property was placed in service in Year. At the time Taxpayer was formed as well as at all relevant times in the planning for the Property and the construction of the Property, it was intended that Taxpayer would elect to use the ADS rather than the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) to depreciate the Property. A tax opinion letter and financial projections were prepared for the Taxpayer based on using the ADS depreciation period. However, when the Year tax return was prepared, the MACRS depreciation period was inadvertently used. The return preparer did not realize the error at the time the Year return was filed. The Taxpayer relied on the return preparer, an individual with experience in the low income housing credit.

PLR-145315-05
2

Taxpayer submitted the request for an extension of time under ' 301.9100-3 on August 9, 2005.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 42(a) provides, in general, for the low income housing credit.

Section 168(g)(7), as amended by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, permits taxpayers to elect for any class of property for any taxable year to use the ADS method of depreciating the property. An election to use ADS shall be irrevocable.

Section 301.9100-7T(a) of the temporary Treasury regulations provides that, for elections under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the election under § 168(g)(7) must be made for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in '' 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term "election" includes an application for relief in respect of tax.

Sections 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of ' 301.9100-2. A request for relief under ' 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSIONS

Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the requirements of '' 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Taxpayer may make the election to use the ADS for the Property. A copy of this letter should be sent to the appropriate service center with a request that it be attached to Taxpayer's amended tax return for the taxable year following Year. A copy is enclosed for that purpose.

PLR-145315-05
3

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provisions of the Code.

We are sending a copy of this letter to the SB/SE Official.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosures (2): copy of this letter copy for section 6110 purposes

cc: ---------------------

----------------------------------
---------------
------------
--------------------------------
--------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace