PLR 200615023: Earlier extension for consolidated group election remains effective

Number
200615023
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other
Code sections
§ 1504, § 6501, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 9, 2006
Publicly released
April 14, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A parent corporation had already received 60 days under an earlier ruling to file an election related to rejoining a consolidated tax group. That earlier request represented that the IRS assessment period would stay open until a specified date, but it expired before then. The parent asked whether this changed the earlier extension. The IRS ruled that the expiration did not affect the prior ruling, so the original 60-day election extension remained in effect. It directed the group to attach both rulings to its amended consolidated return.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did early expiration of the assessment period invalidate an earlier extension for a section 1504 election?
  • Outcome: Approved: the prior extension remained in force.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1504(a)(3), 6501(a); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200615023
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/14/2006
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
--------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B06
PLR-157165-05
-
Date:
January 09, 2006

Dear --------------:

This letter responds to your November 9, 2005 request that we supplement our letter ruling dated June 22, 2005 (PLR-114185-05, PLR200539007) (the “Prior Ruling”). The information submitted for consideration is summarized below. All terms in this ruling have the meanings assigned to them in the Prior Ruling.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the information, representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

In the Prior Ruling, Parent requested an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file a request for an automatic waiver, pursuant to §1504(a)(3)(B) of the Code and Rev. Proc. 2002-32, 2002-1 C.B. 959, of the application of §1504(a)(3)(A) with respect to each of Parent, Sub # 1, and Sub # 2 (the “Election”).

In the Prior Ruling, an extension of time was granted under § 301.9100-3, until 60 days from the date on the Prior Ruling to make the Election, by attaching the statement described in section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2002-32 to the Date 6 to Date 7 Restored Parent Group amended consolidated return.

In the Prior Ruling, Parent represented that the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) would not expire for Parent’s, Sub # 1’s, and Sub # 2’s taxable years in which the reaffiliation occurred or for any years that would have been affected by the Election had it been timely filed until at least Date 9. However, the period of limitations expired prior to Date 9. Parent has requested a ruling that the Prior Ruling remain in full force and effect, notwithstanding the expiration of the period of limitations on assessment prior to Date 9.

PLR-157165-05
2

Based solely on the information and representations submitted with the original and supplemental requests, we rule as follows:

The expiration of the period of limitations on assessment prior to Date 9 will not adversely affect the Prior Ruling. Accordingly, the extension of time to file the Election granted under § 301.9100-3 in the Prior Ruling until 60 days from the date on the Prior Ruling remains in full force and effect

This supplemental ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this supplemental ruling letter together with the Prior Ruling must be attached to the Restored Parent Group amended return.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace