PLR 200609023: IRA rollover waiver denied after owner delayed deposit
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An IRA owner took a distribution, placed it with a company while considering an IRA annuity, and later received the funds back by check. He did not cash the check, but also did not deposit the amount into a new IRA until after the 60 day rollover period. He sought a waiver, citing his belief that leaving the check uncashed preserved rollover eligibility and concern over a close friend's illness and death. The IRS denied the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I). It found that the owner could have deposited the funds on time and had not sought professional advice to check his understanding of the rules. The later IRA contribution was therefore not treated as a valid rollover.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the IRS waive the 60 day IRA rollover deadline for a delayed deposit?
- Outcome: Denied the waiver and declined to treat the later contribution as a valid rollover.
- Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
Number: 200609023
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
DEC - 7 2005
SE:T:EP:RA:T3
Legend:
Taxpayer A =
Taxpayer B =
IRA X =
IRA Y =
Amount A =
Company A =
Company B =
Company C =
Dear [redacted]
This is in response to your request dated , as supplemented by correspondence dated , , ;
; , and , in which you request a waiver of the 60-day
rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).
?
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested
Taxpayer A, who has not attained age 70 1/2, represents that he received a distribution from an individual retirement account maintained in his name with Company A, IRA X, totaling Amount A on or about , 2003. On or about , 2003, Taxpayer A placed Amount A in an account with Company B while he reviewed a Company B IRA annuity contract to determine if he should place Amount A in such an
Page 2
200609023
annuity. On or about , 2003, Taxpayer A decided not to do so because of the high fee involved in purchasing such a contract. Shortly thereafter, on or about , 2003, Company B cancelled Taxpayer A’s account, and a few days later, on or about
, 2003, remitted, by means of a check, Amount A to Taxpayer A. Said check was not cashed by Taxpayer A. During , 2003, Company B reissued its check to Taxpayer A. On or about , 2004, Taxpayer A contributed Amount A into an IRA, IRA Y, set up in his name with Company C.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) was due (1) to his belief that as long as he did not cash the check which he received from Company B thereby not using his IRA funds he retained the ability to roll over Amount A into another IRA, and (2) to his concern over the failing health, and eventual death, of a close friend, Taxpayer B. As noted above, Amount A was eventually contributed into IRA Y where it remained as of the date of this ruling request.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service waive the 60 day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount A contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code in this instance.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such
Page 3
200609023
individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60- day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
The information presented by Taxpayer A is consistent with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover was caused by his failure to understand the rollover rules and by his concern over the failing health of a close companion. However, the Service notes that Taxpayer A did not contact a tax professional to determine if his understanding of the rollover rules was correct and what effect his decision to cancel his Company B annuity contract after the expiration of the 60-day period applicable to the distribution he received from IRA X would have on his ability to accomplish a rollover of Amount A. Furthermore, the Service also notes that the ability to deposit Amount A into a rollover IRA within the requisite 60-day period was at all times within the control of Taxpayer A.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby declines to waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount A from IRA X. Thus, the Service declines to treat Taxpayer A’s contribution of Amount A into IRA Y on or about Date 6, 2004, as a valid rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Page 4
200609023
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact [redacted], Esquire at [redacted]. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T:3.
Sincerely yours,
[illegible signature]
Manager, Employee Plans
Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace