PLR 200608013: Form 3115 treated as timely after security delay

Number
200608013
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 446, § 6110
Ruling dated
November 18, 2005
Publicly released
February 24, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A parent corporation prepared its consolidated return with a subsidiary's Form 3115 for an accounting method change, but its courier could not mail the return on the due date. The IRS letter says an unforeseen security response to an alleged terrorist threat near the post office delayed the courier, and the return was filed the next day. The IRS granted an extension for the original Form 3115 and treated the form attached to the return as timely filed. It did not extend the deadline for the return itself or decide whether the requested accounting method change otherwise qualified under Revenue Procedure 2002-9.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the subsidiary's Form 3115 be treated as timely despite the one-day mailing delay?
  • Outcome: Approved timely treatment for Form 3115; the return filing deadline was not extended.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 446(e); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-9.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200608013
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/24/2006
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-----------------
----------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
-----------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------
CC:TEGE:EB:EC
PLR-138566-05
Date:
-
November 18, 2005

Parent = ------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Subsidiary = ---------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Year X = --------

Date Y = ---------------------------

Date Z = ---------------------------

Post Office = --------------------------------------------------------------------

Building = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

Agency = ----------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------

This is in response to a letter dated February 25, 2005, submitted by your authorized representative, requesting an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file, on behalf of Subsidiary, the original Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, for Year X. The facts, as represented by Parent, are as follows:

Parent timely prepared its consolidated federal corporation income tax return, including the accompanying elections, notices, and certifications, all of which were to be

PLR-138566-05
2

filed on Date Y, the due date for the return plus an automatic six month extension. Parent hired a courier service to deliver its returns to Post Office for mailing on Date Y. The Post Office is located across the street from Building, which was in a state of high security on Date Y as a result of Agency having identified Building as allegedly targeted by terrorists. As a result of a series of unforeseen events arising from this terrorist threat, the courier could not, and did not, timely file Parent’s return. The return was filed on the following day, Date Z. Until the morning of Date Z, Parent was unaware of the courier delay. Affidavits submitted substantiate these facts.

Among other required or permitted documents and schedules, Parent’s return contained an original Form 3115 under Rev. Proc. 2002-9, 2002-1 C.B. 327 for automatic consent of a change in method of accounting for deferred compensation. The copy of Form 3115 was mailed to the IRS National Office on Date Z.

Rev. Proc. 2002-9, provides the procedures by which a taxpayer may obtain automatic consent to change certain methods of accounting. A taxpayer complying with all the applicable provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-9 is considered to have obtained the consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to change the taxpayer's method of accounting under § 446(e) of the Internal Revenue Code and the Income Tax Regulations thereunder.

Section 6.02(3)(a) of Rev. Proc. 2002-9 provides that a taxpayer changing a method of accounting pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002-9 must complete and file a Form 3115 in duplicate. The original must be attached to the taxpayer's timely filed (including extensions) original federal income tax return for the year of change and a copy (with signature) of the Form 3115 must be filed with the IRS National Office no earlier than the first day of the year of change and no later than when the original is filed with the federal income tax return for the year of change.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 set forth the standards to be used by the Commissioner in determining whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer

PLR-138566-05
3

acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Based solely on the facts and the representations submitted, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been met. Accordingly, an extension of time is hereby granted for Parent to file the original Form 3115 for a Change in Accounting Method for Subsidiary. In this regard, we will consider the Form 3115 attached to Parent’s consolidated federal corporation income tax return for Year X to be timely filed. A copy of this letter ruling should be associated with the Form 3115.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal income tax consequences of the facts described above. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning (i) whether Parent is qualified to file the Form 3115 for the change in method of accounting described above under Rev. Proc. 2002-9; (ii) whether Parent meets the requirements of that revenue procedure for the Form 3115 described above; or (iii) whether each item of property or expenditure that is the subject of the Form 3115 described above meets the requirements of Rev. Proc. 2002-9. Further, this ruling letter does not grant an extension of time for filing Parent’s consolidated federal income tax return for Year X.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the provisions of the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this ruling letter to Parent’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

_______
Catherine Livingston Fernandez
Chief, Executive Compensation Branch
Office of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government
Entities)

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace