PLR 200607014: Late Canadian retirement plan deferral election allowed

Number
200607014
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other
Code sections
§ 6110
Ruling dated
November 3, 2005
Publicly released
February 17, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A U.S. permanent resident had contributed to Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans for years. A new accountant discovered that the prior accountant had not advised him to elect deferral of current U.S. tax on income accruing in the plans under the U.S. and Canada treaty procedure. The IRS found that he met the standards for discretionary relief and gave him 60 days from the ruling letter to make the election for the specified tax years. The ruling says the election generally cannot be revoked without IRS consent and requires a Form 8891 for each covered plan for 2004 and later years until final distribution. The extension did not determine whether he otherwise qualified to make the election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer make a late election to defer U.S. tax on Canadian retirement plan income?
  • Outcome: Approved a 60-day extension; underlying eligibility was not decided.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200607014
Release Date: 2/17/2006
Index Number: 9100.22-00; 9114.03-06

------------------------
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------
----------------------, ID No. -------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------

-                                                            Refer Reply To:
                                                          CC: INTL – PLR-158776-04
                                                          Date: November 3, 2005

      -

Tax Years: --------------

A = ------------------------
TIN--------------------

Tax Years = --------------

Prior Accountant = --------------------------------

Current Accountant = ------------------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Dear -------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated September 20, 2004, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for A to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Years. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

A established and has been contributing to certain Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs) for many years. A became a lawful permanent resident of the United States in Year 1. A engaged Current Accountant to prepare his federal income tax return for Year 2. Current Accountant discovered that Prior Accountant had failed to 2

In re: PLR-158776-04

advise A of the need to make an election pursuant to the U.S. – Canada Treaty in order to defer current U.S. taxation of any income accruing in the plans

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory election within the meaning of § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant A an extension of time, provided that A satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that A satisfies the standards of § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, A is granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23 for Tax Years.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For 2004 and all subsequent tax years until the tax year in which a final distribution is made from the RRSP, A must file a Form 8891 (U.S. Information Return For Certain Canadian Registered Retirement Plans) for each RRSP for which the election is made.

As provided in § 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election for Tax Years.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented. 3

In re: PLR-158776-04

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with A’s amended tax returns for Tax Years.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who has requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Taxpayer’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

___
M. Grace Fleeman
Senior Counsel
CC:INTL:Br1

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

CC:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace