PLR 200604020: Stock sale tested using subsidiary's underlying assets for PFIC income

Number
200604020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Special Rules
Code sections
§ 954, § 957, § 965, § 1291, § 1297, § 1298, § 6110
Ruling dated
October 21, 2005
Publicly released
January 27, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A foreign corporation sold stock in a wholly owned subsidiary before it became a controlled foreign corporation. Its U.S. owner needed to assess whether the seller had been a passive foreign investment company (PFIC), which could affect a planned repatriation of earnings. The question was whether gain from the stock sale counted as passive income. The IRS ruled that, for this test, the seller is treated as selling its proportional share of the subsidiary's underlying assets, including assets of lower tier subsidiaries in which it indirectly owned at least 25 percent by value. The ruling sets out how to classify the gain; it does not decide the corporation's overall PFIC status.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the seller's gain from subsidiary stock be tested as a sale of its share of the underlying assets for PFIC passive income purposes?
  • Outcome: Approved that method for testing the gain.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 954(c), 1297(a), 1297(b)(1), 1297(c).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200604020
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 1/27/2006
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 1297.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------
------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------
CC:INTL:B02
---------------------------
PLR-139517-05
Date:
In Re:
October 21, 2005
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
---------------------------------

Legend

A = ----------------------------------
------------------------
B = -------------------
C = -----------------------------------------
D = ----------------------------
Business X = ------------------------------------
Date X = -----------------
Date Y = --------------------------
Country M = ------------
Country N = ------------------
Country O = -----------
Country P = ----------
Country Q = ----------------

Dear --------------:

This is in response to your letter dated July 26, 2005, requesting a ruling that a foreign subsidiary that recognized gain from selling stock in its 25%-owned subsidiaries before becoming a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) is treated as selling its proportionate share of the underlying assets of those subsidiaries in determining whether the gain was “passive income” under section 1297(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer, and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
PLR-139517-05
2
material submitted in support of this request for ruling, such material is subject to verification upon examination.

FACTS

A, a U.S. corporation, is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of B, a publicly traded, SEC-registered, Country M corporation that is the common parent of a global group of operating companies engaged in business X. A is the holding company for operating companies in Countries N, O, and P.

A owns 100% of the stock of C, a Country Q corporation that currently is a CFC, within the meaning of section 957(a).

On Date X, C sold all the stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary, D, a Country Q corporation that directly or indirectly owned the stock of several European operating companies. At the time of the sale, C had both U.S. and foreign owners and was not a CFC.

A plans to repatriate C’s earnings and profits on or before Date Y and reinvest them in the United States in accordance with section 965. Section 965 provides a temporary 85% dividends-received deduction for cash dividends from CFCs that are reinvested in the United States.

To determine whether the repatriation will trigger the application of section 1291, Taxpayer must know whether C is a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”).
Section 1298(b)(1) provides that stock of a corporation held by a taxpayer is stock in a PFIC if, at any time during the taxpayer’s holding period, the corporation was a PFIC that was not a QEF. To determine whether C was a PFIC in the year of the sale of D stock, Taxpayer must know whether C’s gain from selling D was “passive income” under section 1297(b).

RULING REQUESTED

In determining whether C’s gain from selling the stock of D is “passive income” under section 1297(b)(1), C is treated as selling its proportionate share of the underlying assets of D and those subsidiaries of D of which C indirectly owns at least 25%.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1297(a) defines a PFIC as any foreign corporation if either (1) 75 percent or more of the gross income of such corporation for the taxable year is passive income, or (2) the average percentage of assets held by such corporation during the taxable
PLR-139517-05
3
year which produce passive income or which are held for the production of passive income is at least 50 percent.

Section 1297(b)(1) defines “passive income” as any income which is of a kind which would be foreign personal holding company income (“FPHCI”) under section 954(c). Section 954(c), in turn, defines FPHCI to include certain categories of income and gains from the sale of certain categories of assets. Therefore, whether C’s gain from selling the stock of D is passive income turns on whether the gain falls within a category of FPHCI under section 954(c).

Section 1297(c) provides that if a foreign corporation directly or indirectly owns at least 25 percent of the stock of another corporation (a “25%-owned subsidiary”), for purposes of determining whether the foreign corporation is a PFIC, the foreign corporation is treated as holding its proportionate share of the assets, and receiving directly its proportionate share of the income, of the 25%-owned subsidiary.

Correspondingly, to determine whether gain from the sale of stock of a 25%- owned subsidiary is “passive income” under section 1297(b)(1), the sale of stock should be treated as a sale of the foreign corporation’s proportionate share of the assets of the 25%-owned subsidiary (and lower-tier 25%-owned subsidiaries) that are treated as held by the foreign corporation under section 1297(c).

Based on the information submitted and representations made:

For purposes of determining whether C is a PFIC under section 1297(a), whether C’s gain from selling the stock of D is “passive income,” under section 1297(b)(1), is determined by treating C as if it sold its proportionate share of the underlying assets of D and of those subsidiaries of D of which C indirectly owns (by value) at least 25%.

This private letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this ruling must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant.
PLR-139517-05
4

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to the taxpayer’s first and second representatives.

Sincerely,

Valerie Mark Lippe
Senior Technical Reviewer
(International)

cc: -------------------------
---------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------

--------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------

----------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
----------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace