PLR 200602021: ESOP owned company allowed early S corporation reelection

Number
200602021
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Election After Termination
Code sections
§ 1042, § 1361, § 1362, § 4978, § 4979A, § 6110
Ruling dated
October 3, 2005
Publicly released
January 13, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation had revoked its S election and planned to become wholly owned by an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). It asked to elect S status again before the usual five year waiting period had passed. The IRS granted consent for the new election to take effect when the ESOP bought the shares. The consent depended on the selling shareholders not electing gain deferral under § 1042 and the corporation not consenting to such an election under the related excise tax provisions. The IRS did not decide whether the corporation otherwise met the requirements for S status.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation make a new S election before the five year waiting period ended after its prior revocation?
  • Outcome: Approved, conditional on no § 1042 election or related corporate consent.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1362(g), 1042, 4978, 4979A; Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-5(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200602021
Release Date: 1/13/2006
Index Number: 1362.01-02

  • Person To Contact:
    -------------------- --------------------- -------- -------------
    ------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
    ------------------------------- --------------------
    ---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
    CC:PSI:2 – PLR-136798-05
    Date:
    October 03, 2005

Legend

X = ------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

D1 = ------------------

D2 = ----------------

D3 = ---------------------

D4 = ---------------------

Dear ----------------------
This letter responds to a letter dated May 26, 2005, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(g) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated on D1. It elected to be an S corporation effective D2, but revoked that election effective D3.

The shareholders of X intend for X to adopt an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). On D4, the ESOP will purchase 100% of the issued and outstanding shares from the shareholders. X will elect to be an S corporation effective D4.
PLR-136798-05
2

X is requesting permission to reelect to be an S corporation effective D4, prior to the termination of the five-year waiting period imposed by § 1362(g). X represents that its shareholders will not make an election under § 1042 upon selling their shares of X stock to the ESOP. X represents that X will not consent to any such election under §§ 4978 and 4979A.

Section 1362(g) provides that if a small business corporation has made an election under § 1362(a) and if such election has been terminated under § 1362(d), the corporation (and any successor corporation) is not eligible to make an election under section 1362(a) for any taxable year before its fifth taxable year which begins after its first taxable year for which the termination is effective, unless the Secretary consents to the election.

Section 1.1362-5(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the corporation has the burden of establishing that under the relevant facts and circumstances, the Commissioner should consent to a new election. The fact that more than 50 percent of the stock in the corporation is owned by persons who did not own any stock in the corporation on the date of the termination tends to establish that consent should be granted. In the absence of this fact, consent ordinarily is denied unless the corporation shows that the event causing termination was not reasonably within the control of the corporation or shareholders having a substantial interest in the corporation and was not part of a plan on the part of the corporation or of such shareholders to terminate the election.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, permission is granted for X to elect to be an S corporation effective D4. This ruling is conditioned on the shareholders of X not making an election under § 1042 concerning the sale of their X stock to the ESOP and X not consenting to any such election under §§ 4978 and 4979A.

Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal income tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code, including whether X was or is a small business corporation under section 1361(b).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-136798-05
3

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being forwarded to X's authorized representative.

Sincerely yours,

Audrey Ellis
Reviewer, Branch 2
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace