PLR 200551030: Funding waiver request withdrawn; pension excise tax waived

Number
200551030
Outcome
Mixed outcome
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Additional Tax
Topics
Code sections
§ 4971
Ruling dated
September 29, 2005
Publicly released
December 23, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company withdrew its request for a waiver of its pension plan's minimum funding standard, and the IRS closed that part of the case. The IRS separately granted waivers of the 100% tax under § 4971(b) for two plan years, covering accumulated funding deficiencies to the extent they had not been corrected. The letter says the company had asked the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to approve a distress termination of the plan, but that request remained pending. The distinct outcomes matter: this letter grants relief from the specified excise tax while recording no minimum funding waiver.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What happened to the minimum funding waiver request and the § 4971(b) tax requests?
  • Outcome: Mixed. The company withdrew the funding request; the IRS granted the tax waivers.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4971(b); ERISA § 3002(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 4971.02-00
200551030

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

SEP 29 2005

In re:

Company =

This letter constitutes notice that pursuant to your request of March 14, 2005, as modified by your authorized representative’s letter dated September 28, 2005:

  1. Your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the above-named
    plan for the plan year ending [redacted] has been withdrawn, and the case has been closed by this office.

  2. Waivers of the 100 percent tax under § 4971(b) of the Internal Revenue Code
    (“Code”) have been granted for the above-named plan for the plan years ending
    [redacted], and [redacted].

The waivers of the 100 percent tax have been granted in accordance with § 3002(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The amounts for which the waivers have been granted are equal to 100 percent of the accumulated funding deficiencies in the funding standard account as of [redacted] and December 31, 2005, the end of the plan years for which the waivers have been granted, to the extent such funding deficiencies have not been corrected.

The Company is the world’s largest manufacturer of [redacted] sold to the
[redacted] trade. The Company produces a unique, hand-crafted product which is configured and customized to the specification of the end-user. According to information submitted by your authorized representative, the Company filed a request with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to effect a distress termination of the Plan in [redacted]. This request is still pending final approval.

200551030

2

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in [redacted], to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in [redacted], and to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact [redacted].

Sincerely yours,

[signature]

Donna M. Prestia, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace