PLR 200551007: Six branches added to late certification relief
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer had already received extra time to file statements concerning dual consolidated losses. While preparing those filings, it discovered that the earlier ruling's schedule omitted certifications for six branches and their specified tax years. This supplemental letter gave the taxpayer 60 days to file those certifications under the applicable regulations. The IRS expressly said the extension did not determine whether the taxpayer otherwise qualified to file them. The letter lists the branches and years covered by the added relief.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the omitted branch certifications receive supplemental filing relief?
- Outcome: Approved. The IRS granted a 60-day extension for the listed branches and years.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2A(d)(3), 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200551007
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 12/23/2005
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------
----------------------, ID No. ------------
---------------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------
-----------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------
CC:INTL
---------------------------
PLR-113868-05
Date:
September 20, 2005
LEGEND
Taxpayer = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Branch A = ----------------------------------------------
Branch B = ---------------------------------------------
Branch C = ----------------------------------------
Branch D = -------------------------------------
Branch E = ----------------------------------------------
Branch F = ---------------------------------------------
Tax Year = -------
One
Tax Year = ------
Two
Dear --------------:
This replies to your representative’s letter dated November 4, 2004, regarding PLR 200501005 (PLR-119527-03) (“PLR”) released on January 7, 2005. In that PLR, Taxpayer was granted an extension of time under Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3 to file the statements described in §1.1503-2A and §1.1503-2 with respect to the entities and tax years listed on Schedule A attached to the PLR.
Taxpayer now represents that during its preparation of the statements indicated in Schedule A of the PLR it discovered that Schedule A inadvertently did not include relief to file certifications under Treas. Reg. §1.1503-2A(d)(3) for six of the entities included in the original request for losses incurred in Tax Years One and Two. A further review of the matter disclosed that certifications were not made for the six branches and their respective tax years as set forth below. Therefore, Taxpayer is requesting relief under
§301.9100-3 to file these certifications as a supplement to the PLR.
PLR-113868-05
2
ADDITONS TO SCHEDULE A OF THE PLR
Branch A
Tax Year One and Tax Year Two
Branch B
Tax Year One and Tax Year Two
Branch C
Tax Year Two
Branch D
Tax Year Two
Branch E
Tax Year One
Branch F
Tax Year One
Based on the facts and representations submitted, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time under Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3 of 60 days from the date of this supplemental ruling letter to the PLR to file the certifications described in §1.1503-2A(d)(3) with respect to the branches and tax years indicated in the above schedule.
The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the certifications. Treas. Reg. §301.9100-1(a). A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the certifications.
This ruling is directed only to Taxpayer, who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel (International)
By: /s/ Richard L. Chewning
Richard L. Chewning
Senior Counsel
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International)
Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace