PLR 200548020: Couple receives more time to combine rental real estate activities

Number
200548020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extension to elect one rental real estate activity
Code sections
§ 469
Ruling dated
August 25, 2005
Publicly released
December 2, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple wanted to elect to treat all their rental real estate interests as one activity for the passive loss rules. Their tax preparer told them about the election but failed to include the required statement with their return, and the couple later filed returns assuming the election had been made. The IRS granted them 90 days from the ruling date to make the election effective for the earlier year. They had to attach the election statement to an amended return for the following year and include a copy of the ruling. The IRS did not decide whether one spouse actually qualified as a real property professional or materially participated in any activity.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the couple make a late election to treat all rental real estate interests as one activity?
  • Outcome: Approved: 90 days to file the election statement as directed.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 469(c)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.469-9(g)(3), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200548020
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 12/2/2005
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 469.03-03, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-----------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------
CC:PSI:B03
------------------------------------
PLR-146821-04
Date:
August 25, 2005
-

Legend

X = --------------------------
--------------------------

Y = ----------------------
--------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Dear -----------------------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated August 31, 2004, and subsequent correspondence requesting a ruling that X and Y be granted an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 469(c)(7)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.469-9(g)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity.
PLR-146821-04
2

Facts

According to the information submitted, X and Y are married individuals who file their income tax returns jointly. It is represented that in Year 1 X was in a real property business as defined by § 469 and was qualified under § 469(c)(7)(B) to make an election to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity. X and Y relied on a professional tax return preparer who advised them of the availability and benefits of an election under § 469(c)(7). The return preparer, however, failed to advise X and Y to include the election statement required by § 1.469-9(g)(3) on their joint tax return for Year 1. Consequently, the election under § 469(c)(7) was not made. X and Y have filed their joint tax returns beginning in Year 1 under the assumption that the election under § 469(c)(7)(A) had been made.

Law and Analysis

Under § 469(c)(2), the term "passive activity" generally includes any rental activity. Section 469(c)(7) provides a limited exception to this rule for taxpayers in a real property business. Specifically, § 469(c)(7)(A) provides that if a taxpayer meets the requirements of § 469(c)(7)(B), the taxpayer's rental real estate activity will no longer be presumptively passive. By its terms, the exception under § 469(c)(7)(A) is to be applied as if each interest of the taxpayer in rental real estate were a separate activity. However, a taxpayer may elect to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single activity.

Section 1.469-9(g)(3) provides that a qualifying taxpayer makes the election to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity by filing a statement with the taxpayer's original income tax return for the taxable year. Section 1.469-9(g)(3) describes the information that must be contained in the statement.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including an election whose deadline is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-1(a).

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
PLR-146821-04
3

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Conclusion

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X and Y are granted an extension of time of ninety (90) days from the date of this letter to make an election under § 469(c)(7)(A) to treat all their interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity effective Year 1. The election must be in the form of the statement required by § 1.469-9(g)(3) and attached to their amended return for Year 2. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election.

Except as specifically provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether X satisfies the requirements under § 469(c)(7)(B) or whether X materially participates in any activity.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Under a power of attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

/s/

Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace