PLR 200546050: Funding waivers for two plans do not restrict a separate pilot plan

Number
200546050
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Funding Standard Account
Code sections
§ 412, § 6110
Ruling dated
August 24, 2005
Publicly released
November 18, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company operated three defined benefit pension plans. Two had minimum funding waivers, and it asked whether the waiver related restriction on benefit increasing amendments also applied to its separate pilot plan. The IRS said it did not. No waiver was in effect for the pilot plan, and its participants could not concurrently earn benefits under the other two plans. The letter therefore concluded that section 412(f)(1) did not apply to the pilot plan.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do waivers for the contract and salaried plans restrict amendments to the separate pilot plan?
  • Outcome: Approved; the waiver related amendment restriction does not apply to the pilot plan.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(f)(1); ERISA §§ 303, 304(b)(1).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.01-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

200546050

AUG 2 4 2005

SE:T:EP:RA:T:A2

Contract Plan = [redacted]
(Plan No. 004)

Salaried Plan = [redacted]
(Plan No. 001)

Company = [redacted]

Union = [redacted]

This letter is in response to your request fro a ruling concerning the Pilot Plan which was submitted by your authorized representative on February 25, 2005. Specifically, you asked us to rule on the following issue:

Whether, because funding waivers are in effect for the Contract and Salaried Plans, the Pilot Plan is subject to the restriction on plan amendments contained in section 412(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) and section 302(b)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”)?

According to facts stated in your ruling request, the Pilot, Contract, and Salaried Plans are qualified defined benefit pension plans. Each Plan provides collectively-bargained pension benefits for its participants. On April 15, 2003, the Contract and Salaried Plans received waivers of the minimum funding standard under section 412(d) of the Code and section 303 of ERISA for the Plan years beginning January 1, [redacted] No funding waiver is currently in effect for the Pilot Plan.

2

200546050

The Union represents the participants of the Pilot Plan for collective bargaining purposes. The participants of the Contract and Salaried Plans are not represented by the Union for collective bargaining purposes. Furthermore, no participant in the Pilot Plan can concurrently accrue a benefit in either the Salaried Plan and/or Contract Plan, and no participant in either the Salaried and/or Contract Plan can concurrently accrue a benefit in the Pilot Plan.

The Company believes that the Pilot Plan is not subject to section 412(f)(1) of the Code and section 303(b)(1) of ERISA because no funding waiver is in effect and because it does not cover substantially the same employees as covered by the Salaried and Contract Plans, for which funding waivers are in effect.

Section 412(f)(1) of the Code and section 304(b)(1) of ERISA provide that if a waiver of the minimum funding standard under section 412(d) of the Code and section 303 of ERISA is in effect with respect to a plan that is amended to increase the liabilities of the plan by reason of any increase in benefits, any change in the accrual of benefits, or any change in the rate at which benefits become nonforfeitable, such waiver shall not apply to any plan year ending on or after the date on which such amendment is adopted. Section 412(f)(2)(A) of the Code and § 304(b)(2)(A) of ERISA provide that section 412(f)(1) of the Code and section 304(b)(1) of ERISA shall not apply to any plan amendment which the Secretary of Labor determines to be reasonable and which provides only de minimis increases in the liabilities of the plan.

Reorganization Plan No. 4, which became effective December 31, 1978, transferred the authority indicated in section 412(f)(2) from the Secretary of Labor to the Secretary of Treasury.

No funding waiver is currently in effect for the Pilot Plan. The Pilot Plan covers only employees which are not participants of the Contract and Salaried Plans, for which funding waivers are in effect. Therefore, section 412(f)(1) of the Code and section 302(b) of ERISA do not apply to the Pilot Plan.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in [redacted]; to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in [redacted], and to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

3

200546050

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact [redacted] at
[redacted]

Sincerely yours,

James E. Holland, Jr., Manager
Employee Plans Technical

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace