PLR 200546031: Late dual consolidated loss election receives 60 day extension

Number
200546031
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503, § 6110
Ruling dated
August 15, 2005
Publicly released
November 18, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer included a foreign entity's loss in its consolidated return after electing to treat the entity as disregarded for federal tax purposes. Its CPA firm's staff missed the required dual consolidated loss election agreement when reviewing the return. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the standards for late regulatory election relief and granted 60 days from the ruling to file the agreement for the redacted tax year. The extension did not decide whether the taxpayer otherwise qualified to make the election. The IRS also said relief was unnecessary for a separate annual certification if it had been filed on time with a later return.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer file the omitted dual consolidated loss election agreement after its return was filed?
  • Outcome: Approved: 60 additional days for the election agreement; a timely separate certification needs no relief.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200546031
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 11/18/2005
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04
Person To Contact:
-----------------------
----------------------, ID No. -------------
---------------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------
CC:INTL
---------------------------
PLR-132912-04
Date:
August 15, 2005

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
Entity = -------------------
Individual = --------------------
A
CPA Firm = ---------------------------------- Date A = -------------------------- Date B = -------------------------- Year X = ------- Year Y = -------

Dear------------------:

This replies to your representative’s letter dated June 15, 2004, in which your representative requests on behalf of Taxpayer an extension of time under Treas. Reg.
§301.9100-3 to file the election and agreement described in §1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) relating to the reporting of dual consolidated losses incurred by Entity in the tax year ended on Date A. (Hereinafter, the tax year ended on Date A may be referred to as Year X.) The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process
.
Taxpayer owned and carried on business operations through Entity, which was a foreign corporation. Taxpayer elected to treat Entity as a disregarded entity for federal

PLR-132912-04
2

income tax purposes and filed a Form 8832 electing such treatment effective on Date B, which date was prior to Year X. Entity is a dual resident corporation under Treas. Reg.
§ 1.1503-2(c).

Entity incurred a loss for the tax year ended on Date A, and this loss was included in the consolidated income tax return of Taxpayer for that tax year.

Taxpayer engaged the services of CPA Firm to prepare and review Taxpayer’s federal income tax return for Year X. Therefore, Taxpayer relied on CPA to ensure that Taxpayer’s federal income tax return for Year X included all required forms, elections and/or agreements to properly reflect the intended treatment of Entity’s dual consolidated losses.

Individual A is a partner with CPA Firm, and was the managing partner responsible for the individuals involved with the tax engagement for Taxpayer. When this staff reviewed the tax return for Year X, the staff did not realize that an election and agreement described in Treas. Reg. 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) should have been included with the tax return. As a result, the tax return was filed without the election and agreement.

The facts and affidavits submitted describe the circumstances that led to the discovery that the election and agreement was not filed. Upon this discovery, CPA Firm and Taxpayer decided to request relief to remedy the missed filing.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in
§301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith within the meaning of §301.9100-3(b), subject to the conditions set forth in §301.9100-3(b)(3), and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government within the meaning of §301.9100-3(c).

In the present situation, the election and agreement described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503- 2(g)(2)(i) is a regulatory election as defined in §301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under §301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an

PLR-132912-04
3

extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards for relief as set forth in
§301.9100-3.

Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the election and agreement described in
§1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) relating to the reporting of dual consolidated losses incurred by Entity in the tax year ended on Date A.

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the elections and agreements. Treas. Reg. §301.9100-1(a).

The facts indicate that Entity incurred a loss in Year Y. The facts also indicate that Taxpayer filed with its tax return for Year Y the election and agreement described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to the Year Y loss, and the annual certification described in §1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to the Year X loss. Taxpayer asks if relief is deemed necessary with respect to the annual certification filed with the tax return for Year Y. Assuming that the annual certification filed with the Year Y tax return was timely filed, relief is not necessary as § 301.9100 applies to elections, including an annual certification, that have not been timely filed.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the elections and agreements.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. §6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel (International)

By: /s/ Meryl Silver
Meryl Silver
Reviewer

Enclosure
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace