PLR 200543030: Late Form 1128 accepted after adviser omitted it

Number
200543030
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Section 442; Accounting Periods
Code sections
§ 442
Ruling dated
June 14, 2005
Publicly released
October 28, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation wanted to change its tax year while electing S corporation status. Its tax professionals told it to file a short-year return and the S election, which it did on time, but did not tell it that Form 1128 was also required for the accounting period change. The IRS found that the corporation acted reasonably and in good faith and that deadline relief would not prejudice the government. It treated the late Form 1128 as timely filed. The ruling did not decide whether the requested accounting period change itself was allowed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation's late Form 1128 application be considered timely?
  • Outcome: Approved as to filing timeliness; permission for the year change was not decided.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; IRC § 442.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200543030
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/28/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.09-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------
-------------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------
---------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-126442-05
-
Date: June 14, 2005

X = --------------------------------------------------- Date 1 = ---------- Date 2 = ------------------ Date 3 = -------------------------- Date 4 = --------------------- Year 1 = -------

Dear ----------------

This letter ruling is in reference to X’s request that its Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year, be considered timely filed under the authority contained in § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administrative Regulations. X is requesting permission to change its accounting period, for federal income tax purposes, from a taxable year ending on Date 1, to one ending on Date 2, effective Date 3.

The information submitted indicated that X advised its tax professionals, during the fall of Year 1, of its desire to become an electing small business corporation. The tax professionals of X advised X to file a short-year federal income tax return, Form 1120, U.S. Corporate Income Tax Return, to change its accounting period from a tax year ending on Date 1 to one ending on Date 2, along with Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation, to be filed by Date 4. At no time was X advised that Form 1128 was required to be filed to change its accounting period. The Forms 1120 and 2553 were timely filed. Due to an error or misunderstanding on the part of the tax professional, the Form 1128 was not timely filed.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as the instant case, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3. Requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interest of the government.

PLR-126442-05
2

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we have concluded that X has acted reasonably and in good faith in respect to this matter. Furthermore, we have determined that the granting of relief in this case will not prejudice the interest of the government within the intendment of § 301.9100-3(c)(1). Accordingly, the requirements of § 301.9100-3 for the granting of relief have been satisfied, and X’s late filed Form 1128 requesting permission to change from a tax year ending on Date 1, to one ending on Date 2, effective Date 3, is considered timely filed.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon facts and representations submitted by X and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as part of an examination process.

This ruling addresses the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief only. No opinion is expressed or implied regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other section of the Internal Revenue Code or Income Tax Regulations that may be applicable thereto, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied as to whether X is permitted under the Code and the applicable regulations to change to the tax year requested in the subject Form 1128.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made in the letter when it is disclosed under § 6110.

In accordance with the provisions of a power of attorney currently on file, we are ending a copy of this letter to the taxpayer’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Michael J. Montemurro
Acting Branch Chief
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosure

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace