PLR 200543019: Revised decommissioning schedule approved after rate reduction
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A part owner of a nuclear power plant asked to revise its decommissioning fund payment schedule after a public utility commission decreased decommissioning costs included in customer rates. The IRS concluded that the proposed schedule met section 468A's requirements based on the commission's cost determination. Payments to the fund can qualify only up to the lesser of the applicable decommissioning costs or the ruling amount for the year. Approval depends on the stated facts, and specified later changes require a further revision request. The published cost and schedule amounts are redacted.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the company use a revised fund payment schedule after the commission lowered the decommissioning costs in rates?
- Outcome: Approved, subject to payment limits and later revision requirements.
- Key authorities: IRC § 468A; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.468A-2(b), 1.468A-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200543019
Release Date: 10/28/2005
Index Number: 468A.04-02
---------------------------------
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ID No. ------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------- ---------------------
--------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------------
CC:PSI:B06 – PLR-114102-05
------------------------
Date:
July 11, 2005
-
Re: Revised Schedule of Ruling Amounts
-------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGEND:
Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------
------------------------
Plant = ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intermediate = -------------------------------------------
------------------------
Collector = ---------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Parent = --------------------------
------------------------
Director = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location = ---------------------------
Commission = ----------------------------------------------------
State = ------------------
Method = ----------------------------------------------------
Order = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund = -------------------------------------------
a = --
Dear ------------:
PLR-114102-05
2
This letter responds to your request, dated March 14, 2005, for a revised schedule of ruling amounts pursuant to ' 1.468A-3(i)(1)(iii)(A)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations. Taxpayer was previously granted a revised schedule of ruling amounts on ---------------------------. Information was submitted pursuant to ' 1.468A-3(h)(2). As set forth more fully below, Taxpayer now seeks a revised schedule of ruling amounts because Commission decreased the decommissioning cost collections for the Plant.
Taxpayer represents the facts and information relating to its request for a revised schedule of ruling amounts as follows:
Taxpayer is wholly owned by Intermediate, which is wholly owned by Parent.
Parent files a consolidated return for the affiliated group which includes Taxpayer, Intermediate, and Parent. Also included in this affiliated group is Collector, which previously collected the decommissioning costs from retail customers and remitted those amounts to Taxpayer. Taxpayer has a --------percent ownership interest as tenant in common in the Plant, acquired from Collector, effective ----------------------.1 This transfer was in response to the laws of State, which provide for competition in the generation and sale of electricity.
The Plant is situated at Location. Plant=s operating license expires on -------------- ------------. The estimated base cost for decommissioning Plant is based on an independent study and the proposed method of decommissioning the Plant is Method.
Taxpayer is subject to the jurisdiction of Commission. In Order, Commission authorized decreases in the nuclear decommissioning costs to be included in the Taxpayer=s cost of service for ratemaking purposes for Plant. Commission determined that the decommissioning costs to be included in cost of service for ratemaking purposes would be reduced to $a for ------- through --------
There are no proceedings pending before Commission that may result in a change to the amount of decommissioning costs for the Plant to be included in the Taxpayer=s cost of service for ratemaking purposes.
Section 468A provides that a taxpayer may elect to deduct the amount of payments made to a qualified decommissioning fund. However, ' 468A(b) limits the amount paid into such fund for any taxable year to the lesser of the amount of nuclear decommissioning costs allocable to this fund which is included in the taxpayer's cost of service for ratemaking purposes for the tax year or the ruling amount applicable to this year.
1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
PLR-114102-05
3
Section 1.468A-2(b)(1) provides that the maximum amount of cash payments made (or deemed made) to a nuclear decommissioning fund during any tax year shall not exceed the lesser of the cost of service amount applicable to the nuclear decommissioning fund for such tax year; or the ruling amount applicable to the nuclear decommissioning fund for such tax year.
Section 1.468A-3(a)(1) provides that, in general, a schedule of ruling amounts for a nuclear decommissioning fund is a ruling specifying annual payments that, over the tax years remaining in the "funding period" as of the date the schedule first applies, will result in a projected balance of the nuclear decommissioning fund as of the last day of the funding period equal to (and in no event more than) the "amount of decommissioning costs allocable to the fund".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Because the Commission has concluded that the amount of decommissioning costs for the Plant to be included in the cost of service for ratemaking purposes is $a for 2004 through 2032, we conclude that the Taxpayer's proposed schedule of ruling amounts satisfies the requirements of ' 468A of the Code.
APPROVED SCHEDULE OF RULING AMOUNTS FOR TAXABLE YEARS --------- THROUGH -------
YEAR
AMOUNT
------------------
-----
Approval of the schedule of ruling amounts is contingent on there being no change in the facts and circumstances, known or assumed, at the time the current ruling is issued. If any of the events described in ' 1.468A-3(i)(1)(iii) occur in future years, the Taxpayer must request a review and revision of the schedule of ruling amounts. Generally, the Taxpayer is required to file such a request on or before the deemed payment deadline date for the first taxable year in which the rates reflecting such action became effective. When no such event occurs, the Taxpayer must file a request for a revised schedule of ruling amounts on or before the deemed payment deadline of the tenth taxable year following the close of the tax year in which the most recent schedule of ruling amounts was received.
PLR-114102-05
4
Except as specifically determined above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the Federal income tax consequences of the transaction described above.
The approved schedule of ruling amounts is relevant only to those payments made to the Fund. Payments allocable to any funds other than the Fund, cannot qualify for purposes of the deduction under the provisions of ' 468A of the Code. Payments made to such Fund can qualify only to the extent that they do not exceed the lesser of the decommissioning costs applicable to such Fund or the ruling amounts applicable to this Fund in the tax year.
This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides it may not be used or cited as precedent. In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative. We are also sending a copy of this letter ruling to the Director. Pursuant to ' 1.468A-7(a), a copy of this letter must be attached (with the required Election Statement) to the Taxpayer's federal income tax return for each tax year in which the Taxpayer claims a deduction for payments made to the Fund.
Sincerely yours,
PETER C. FRIEDMAN
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace