PLR 200542019: Duty injury disability benefits excluded from income

Number
200542019
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Workmen's Compensation
Code sections
§ 61, § 104
Ruling dated
July 19, 2005
Publicly released
October 21, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A police officer received disability retirement benefits after an injury sustained in the line of duty. The benefits were payable under a city statute for service connected disability and were not based on age, length of service, or prior contributions. The IRS concluded that the statute was in the nature of a workers' compensation act, so payments under it were excluded from the officer's gross income under section 104(a)(1). Using prior salary to calculate the benefit did not change that result.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are the officer's line of duty disability benefits taxable income?
  • Outcome: Approved: the benefits are excluded from gross income.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 104(a)(1); Treas. Reg. § 1.104-1(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200542019
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/21/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 104.02-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------
-------------------------, ID No. ------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
-
CC:TEGE:EB:HW
PLR-126896-05
Date:
July 19, 2005
-

LEGEND:

Taxpayer = ----------------------
----------------------------------------

City = -------------------------

Statute = -----------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------:

This is in reply to a letter of March 28, 2005, submitted on your behalf, requesting a ruling on the Federal income tax treatment of certain disability benefits under section 104(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

In the course of your employment as a police officer, you were physically disabled as the result of an on-the-job injury. You were found by the City to have been injured while discharging duties within the scope of your employment and were awarded benefits under the City Statute.

The Statute provides that:

If any participant, regardless of the number if completed years of continuous service with the employer, shall incur a total and permanent disability in the line of duty, such participant shall be entitled to receive a disability retirement benefit in an amount equal to the normal retirement

PLR-126896-05
2
benefit . . . , based on the final monthly average salary of the participant at the date the total ands [sic.] permanent disability was incurred.

Section 61(a) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided by law, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including compensation for services.

Section 104(a)(1) of the Code provides that gross income does not include amounts received under workmen's compensation acts as compensation for personal injuries or sickness.

Section 1.104-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations states that section 104(a)(1) of the Code excludes from gross income amounts received by an employee under a workmen's compensation act or under a statute in the nature of a workmen's compensation act that provides compensation to the employee for personal injury or sickness incurred in the course of employment. Section 1.104-1(b) of the regulations also states that this exclusion does not apply to the amount received either to the extent that it is determined by reference to the employee's age or length of service, or the employee's prior contributions, even though the employee's retirement is occasioned by an occupational injury or sickness, or to the extent that it is in excess of the amount provided in the applicable workmen's compensation act or acts.

The fact that the amount received as a disability retirement pension is computed with regard to the employee's salary prior to retirement does not disqualify the payment from being in the nature of workmen's compensation. See, Rev. Rul. 85-104, 1985-2 C.B. 52; Rev. Rul. 75-500, 1975-2 C.B. 44; and Rev. Rul. 68-10, 1968-1 C.B. 50.

The Statute limits benefits to employees who suffer service-connected disability. The benefits are not determined on the basis of age, length of service, or prior contributions. Thus, the Statute is a statute in the nature of a workmen's compensation act.

Accordingly, based on the representations made and authorities cited above, we conclude that amounts you receive under the Statute are excludable from your gross income under section 104(a)(1) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the federal tax consequences of the transaction under any other section of the Code or Statute other than those specifically stated above.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-126896-05
3

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Harry Beker
Chief, Health and Welfare Branch
Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt and Government Entities)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace