PLR 200540023: Family concerns do not justify late IRA rollover waiver

Number
200540023
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Rollover Contributions
Code sections
§ 408
Ruling dated
July 13, 2005
Publicly released
October 7, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer withdrew money from an IRA to cover costs of selling and buying rental properties, then missed the 60-day deadline to roll the money back into an IRA. He asked for a waiver, saying concern over his child's neurological difficulties had occupied his attention. The IRS denied the request. It noted that the concern predated the withdrawal, that the taxpayer completed other financial transactions during the period, and that sale proceeds arrived before he received the child's final test report. On those facts, the IRS found no circumstance that justified waiving the deadline.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the taxpayer's family circumstances justify waiving the 60-day IRA rollover deadline?
  • Outcome: Denied; the IRS declined to waive the deadline.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
200540023
TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DIVISION
JUL 13 2005

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
SE:T:EP:RA:T1

Legend:
Taxpayer A
Amount P
Amount Q
Dear

This is in response to a letter dated February 9, 2005, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The following facts and representations were submitted under penalty of perjury in support of your request.

Taxpayer A maintained an Individual Retirement Account (“IRA X”) under Code section 408(a). On November 29, 2004, Taxpayer A withdrew Amount P from IRA X to pay for pre-closing and closing costs associated with the sale of beach rental property and the purchase of a different beach rental property. The sale and purchase occurred on December 1 and 2 of 2004, respectively, and proceeds of Amount Q, an amount in excess of Amount P, were deposited in a money market account on January 18, 2005, a date within the 60-day period for rollovers.

Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to timely roll over Amount P was due to his attention being focused on his child’s neurological difficulties. Due to ongoing concerns regarding the development of speech and motor skills of his preschool- age child, and as a result of teacher recommendations after Taxpayer A’s child entered preschool in the fall of 2004, Taxpayer A sought a neuropsychological assessment of his child. Testing occurred throughout December of 2004 and on January 26, 2005, Taxpayer A received a final report that confirmed his ongoing concerns. He notes that he received the final report prior to the expiration of the 60-day period. It appears from the final report, included in Taxpayer A’s submission, that Taxpayer A’s child received testing prior to the above neuropsychological assessment, although the nature of such testing is unclear because this section of the report was redacted for privacy purposes. The submission also indicates that concerns were raised in November of 2004, and

2 200540023

an occupational therapist began working with Taxpayer A’s child on a weekly basis six months prior to the December neuropsychological assessment.

Based on the above facts and representations, Taxpayer A requests that the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to Amount P.

Code section 408(d)(1) provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72.

Code section 408(d)(3) defines IRA rollovers and provides the rules applicable thereto.

Code section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) provides that section 408(d)(1) does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution.

Code section 408(d)(3)(B) provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the one-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Code section 408(d)(3)(D) provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.

Code section 408(d)(3)(I) provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I).

Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to Code section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,

3 200540023

whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

Although the information presented shows that Taxpayer A’s child suffers from a neurological disability, such disability was an ongoing concern to Taxpayer A and predates Taxpayer A’s withdrawal from his IRA. During the time leading up to, and including, the testing of Taxpayer A’s child, Taxpayer A was able to keep track of other matters and engage in financial transactions such as the IRA withdrawal on November 29, 2004 and the real estate transactions on December 1 and December 2, 2004. In addition, Taxpayer A received the proceeds of his real estate transaction on January 18, 2005, prior to having received his child’s test results. Thus, the facts in this case do not demonstrate the type of circumstance that would justify a waiver of the 60-day rollover period. Therefore, the Service declines to waive the 60-day requirement under section 408(d)(3) in this case.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other Code section which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Code section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice 437

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace