PLR 200537022: Taxpayer receives time to file dual consolidated loss election

Number
200537022
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 17, 2005
Publicly released
September 16, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer prepared its own federal income tax return and omitted a required election and agreement concerning dual consolidated losses of two entities. A review after filing found the omission; the official responsible for the return said he had not known the filing was required. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the standards for an extension under Treasury Regulation section 301.9100-3. It gave the taxpayer 60 days from the ruling to file the election and agreement. The IRS expressly did not decide whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible to make them.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive more time to file the dual consolidated loss election and agreement?
  • Outcome: Approved; the extension was 60 days, without a finding on underlying eligibility.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200537022
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 9/16/2005
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04
Person To Contact:
--------------------------
-----------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------
CC:INTL
PLR-153028-03
In Re:
Date:
-----------------------
June 17, 2005
--------------------------------
--------------------------
-------------------------------

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
Entity One = -----------------------
Entity Two = ------------------------
Individual = ---------------------
A
Date A = -------------------------

Dear ------------------:

This replies to a letter dated July 23, 2003, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3 to file the election and agreement described in
§1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to the dual consolidated losses of Entity One and Entity Two that were incurred in the fiscal year ended on Date A. Additional information was submitted in letters dated November 2, 2004, April 1, 2005, and June 2, 2005. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

PLR-153028-03
2

Taxpayer prepared its own U.S. federal income tax return for the fiscal year ended on Date A. Individual A was the vice president of tax and legal services. In that position, Individual A was responsible for the preparation of the tax return for that year. After the tax return was filed, the return was reviewed, which led to the discovery that the election and agreement required under §1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) had not been filed with the return. Individual A states in his affidavit that he was not aware of that requirement or the related consequences of not making the election.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in
§301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith within the meaning of §301.9100-3(b), subject to the conditions set forth in §301.9100-3(b)(3), and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government within the meaning of §301.9100-3(c).

In the present situation, the election and agreement described in §1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) is a regulatory election as defined in §301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under §301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards for relief as set forth in §301.9100-3.

Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies
§301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the election and agreement described in §1.1503- 2(g)(2)(i) with respect to the dual consolidated losses of Entity One and Entity Two that were incurred in the fiscal year ended on Date A.

PLR-153028-03
3

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the elections and agreements. §301.9100-1(a).

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the elections and agreements.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. §6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to the Taxpayer, and the other authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel (International)

By: /s/ Meryl Silver
Meryl Silver
Reviewer

Enclosure
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace