IRS determination 200536029: IRS returns an annuity ruling request without a ruling

Number
200536029
Outcome
Other outcome
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
Code sections
§ 72
Ruling dated
June 17, 2005
Publicly released
September 9, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An annuity recipient asked the IRS for a ruling on how much of each payment could be excluded from income. The IRS returned the request and the $95 fee without issuing a ruling because it could not reach the recipient to establish whether any previously taxed contributions had gone into the pension fund. It explained that section 72 generally taxes annuity payments but allows exclusion of the part representing a return of previously taxed contributions. If no contributions had been taxed when made, the entire annuity benefit would be taxable. The recipient could resubmit the request with documentation of any previously taxed investment in the contract.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What exclusion ratio applies to the recipient's annuity payments?
  • Outcome: No ruling issued; the IRS returned the fee and invited a documented resubmission.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 72.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

200536029

JUN 17 2005

UIL: 72.00-00
SE:T:EP:A1

This is in reply to your request for a ruling regarding the correct exclusion ratio to determine the income tax treatment of annuity payments to you from the Office of DC Pensions.

We are not issuing a ruling at this time. Instead we are returning the check for $95.00 which you sent with your request for a ruling. We believe that there may be no applicable exclusion ratio for your annuity, but we are unable to establish this with certainty because we have been unable to contact you directly. Below you will find general information which may clarify your tax situation, and from which you may determine whether you need a ruling on the exclusion ratio for your annuity.

Annuity payments are generally includible in gross income under section 72 of the Internal Revenue Code. However, that portion of each payment which represents the return of previously taxed contributions to the fund is excludible from gross income. Such taxed contributions usually are amounts allocated to the employee’s pay, included in income, taxed, and then withheld from the paycheck as a contribution to the retirement fund, for each pay period before retirement. For each annuity contract, the exclusion ratio is found by dividing the employee’s pre-taxed investment in the contract by the expected return under the contract. The exclusion ratio establishes the portion of each payment which represents a return of money upon which taxes have already been paid, and which is now excludable from income.

In some cases, none of the funds contributed to the pension fund have been included in the employee’s taxable income while working. Such funds would not have been taxed, and would not constitute a pre-taxed investment in the contract. In this case there would be no exclusion ratio, and the entire annuity benefit would be taxable as income.

If you still feel that you need a ruling on the income tax treatment of your annuity, you may resubmit your request. Please provide clear documentation as to the amount of your previously taxed investment in the contract.

200536029

2

If you have any question concerning this matter, please contact
[redacted] (not a toll-free number). Or you may contact
[redacted], Acting Manager, Actuarial Group 1, at
[redacted] (also not a toll-free number).

Sincerely yours

Larry Isaacs, Acting Manager
Employee Plan Actuarial Group 1

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace