PLR 200534003: Couple may make late election to group rental properties
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A married couple filed a joint return without the statement electing to treat all their rental real estate interests as one activity. They said their tax preparer had not advised them of the election. The IRS found that the late election relief requirements were met and gave them 60 days to file the election statement with an amended return, effective for the redacted tax year. The IRS did not determine whether they qualified as real estate professionals or materially participated in any activity.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the couple make a late election to treat all rental real estate interests as one activity?
- Outcome: Approved: a 60-day extension was granted for the election with an amended return.
- Key authorities: IRC § 469(c)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.469-9(g)(3), 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200534003
Release Date: 8/26/2005
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 469.03-03
- Person To Contact:
------------------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------
--------------------------- ---------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:2 – PLR-102350-05
Date:
May 13, 2005
LEGEND
Taxpayers = ----------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
------------------
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Dear --------------------------
This responds to a letter dated December 21, 2004, submitted on behalf of Taxpayers by their authorized representative requesting a ruling that they be granted an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 469(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.469-9(g)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity.
Facts
According to the information submitted, Taxpayers are married individuals who filed their tax returns jointly. Taxpayers represent that in Year 1 they were in a real property business as defined by § 469 and were qualified under § 469(c)(7)(B) to make an election to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity. However, Taxpayers, having relied on a professional tax return preparer who failed to advise them of the availability and benefits of an election under § 469(c)(7), filed their joint return for Year 1 without the statement required under § 1.469-9(g)(3).
PLR-102350-05
2
Law and Analysis
Under § 469(c)(2), the term "passive activity" generally includes any rental activity. Section 469(c)(7) provides a limited exception to this rule for taxpayers in a real property business. Specifically, § 469(c)(7)(A) indicates that if a taxpayer meets the requirements of section 469(c)(7)(B), the taxpayer's rental real estate activity will no longer be presumptively passive. By its terms, the exception under § 469(c)(7)(A) is to be applied as if each interest of the taxpayer in rental real estate were a separate activity. However, a taxpayer may elect to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single activity.
Section 1.469-9(g)(3) provides that a qualifying taxpayer makes the election to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity by filing a statement with the taxpayer's original income tax return for the taxable year. Section 1.469-9(g)(3) describes the information that must be contained in the statement.
Under section 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including an election whose deadline is prescribed by a regulation published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election.
Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that subject to paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of § 301.9100-3, when a taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make the election, the taxpayer will be deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith.
PLR-102350-05
3
Conclusion
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, Taxpayers are granted an extension of time of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to make an election under § 469(c)(7)(A) to treat all their interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity effective Year 1. The election must be in the form of the statement required by § 1.469-9(g)(3) and attached to an amended return for Year 1. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election.
Except as specifically provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether Taxpayers satisfy the requirements under § 469(c)(7)(B) or whether Taxpayers materially participate in any activity.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace