PLR 200520001: Parent gets time to file subsidiary stock loss statement

Number
200520001
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Transitional Loss Limitation; Regulation Section 1.337(d); Loss on Stock of Subsidiary
Code sections
§ 337, § 6501
Ruling dated
February 15, 2005
Publicly released
May 20, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated corporate group sold all the stock of a subsidiary in a taxable transaction. Its return treated a loss election as made, but the required statement was not attached. The IRS found that the parent had relied reasonably on a tax professional and met the standards for discretionary filing relief. It granted 90 days to file the statement. The extension was conditioned on the group's aggregate tax liability for affected years being no lower than it would have been with a timely election, accounting for the time value of money. The IRS did not decide whether the parent substantively qualified for the election or whether the reported loss was allowable.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent file a late statement to seek recognition of a loss on subsidiary stock?
  • Outcome: A 90 day filing extension was granted, subject to the stated tax liability condition.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.337(d)-2T(c), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200520001
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/20/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 337.15-00, 9100.29-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------
------------------, ID No. -------------
---------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------
---------------------
--------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------
CC:CORP:B06
-------------------------------
PLR-100459-05
Date:
February 15, 2005
----------------------
----------------------
--------------------------
------------------
------------------------------

Legend

Parent = ----------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Seller = --------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Target = -----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = --------------------------

Date 2 = -------------------

Corporate Officer = --------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------

This letter responds to a letter dated December 3, 2004, submitted on behalf of Parent, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election. Parent is requesting an extension to file a

PLR-100459-05
2

“§ 1.337(d)-2T(c) statement” under § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3) (the “Election”) that was required to be filed with its consolidated Federal income tax return filed on Date 2. Additional information was submitted in a letter dated February 15, 2005. The information submitted is summarized below.

Parent is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations filing a consolidated Federal income tax return. Parent owns all of the stock of Seller, which owned all of the stock of Target.

On Date 1, Seller sold all of the stock of Target in a taxable transaction.

An election under § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3) to recognize some or all of a loss upon the disposition of the stock of a subsidiary (Target) was required to be filed with or as part of Parent's consolidated group’s return for the year of the disposition, the year that includes Date 1. Parent intended to attach the Election to its consolidated Federal income tax return filed for that taxable year, but for various reasons the Election was not attached. The return was filed consistent with the Election having been made. The statute of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) has not expired for Parent's consolidated group’s taxable year for which it wants to make the Election or for any taxable years that would be affected by the Election had it been timely filed.

Section 1.337(d)-2T(a)(1) provides that no deduction is allowed for any loss recognized by a member of a consolidated group with respect to the disposition of stock of a subsidiary.

Section 1.337(d)-2T(c)(1) provides that § 1.337(d)-2T(c) applies with respect to stock of a subsidiary only if a separate statement entitled “§ 1.337(d)-2T(c) statement” is included with the return in accordance with § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3).

Section 1.337(d)-2T(c)(2) provides that loss is not disallowed under § 1.337(d)-2T(a)(1) to the extent the taxpayer establishes that the loss is not attributable to the recognition of built-in gain on the disposition of an asset (including stock and securities).

Section 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3) provides that the statement required under § 1.337(d)- 2T(c)(1) must be included with or as part of the taxpayer’s return for the year of the disposition.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for

PLR-100459-05
3

making certain elections. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.337(d)- 2T(c)(3)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the Election, provided Parent shows that it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100- 3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent and Corporate Officer explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file the Election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, the Election, the request for relief was filed before the failure to make the Election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service, and that the government will not be prejudiced if relief is granted. See '' 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations made, we conclude that Parent has shown that it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted under § 301.9100-3, until 90 days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the Election.

The above extension of time is conditioned on Parent’s consolidated group’s tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to Parent’s consolidated group’s tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the Director's office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved. Further, no opinion is expressed as to the Federal income tax effect, if any, if it is determined that the taxpayers' liability is lower. Section 301.9100-3(c).

We express no opinion with respect to whether, in fact, Parent qualifies substantively to make the Election. In addition, we express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling. For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3 we relied on certain statements and representations made by Parent and Corporate Officer. However, the Director should verify all essential facts. Moreover, notwithstanding that the extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable still apply.

PLR-100459-05
4

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Ken Cohen

Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer
Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace