Determination 200519090: IRS extends a deadline tied to pension funding waiver
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS had conditionally waived a pension plan's minimum funding standard in an earlier ruling. This letter modified that ruling by changing the deadline for an agreement with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to secure repayment of the waived amount. The parties had been negotiating a tentative security agreement, but required third party approvals delayed the final documents. The new deadline is redacted in the released letter. The letter changes the deadline and does not restate the other terms of the earlier waiver.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the deadline for a PBGC security agreement under a conditional minimum funding waiver be changed?
- Outcome: Deadline modified; the new date is redacted.
- Key authorities: IRC § 412 (minimum funding standard).
Full text (IRS public release)
Significant Index No. 0412.06-00
200519090
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
FEB 17 2005
In re:
This letter constitutes notice that the conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for the above-named Plan for the plan year ending [redacted] which was granted in our ruling letter dated September 16, 2004, has been modified by changing the deadline by which an agreement must be reached with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") on securing repayment of the waived amount from 120 days from the date of the original ruling letter [redacted] to
[redacted].
According to information submitted with the request, a tentative agreement on security was being negotiated with the PBGC before the [redacted] deadline. However, the official documents have not been signed because they require the approval of third parties who are currently in the process of reviewing the documents. The final documents are expected to be signed before [redacted].
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.
We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in [redacted], to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in [redacted], and to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.
200519090
2
If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact [redacted] at [redacted].
Sincerely yours,
for Carol D. Gold
Director, Employee Plans
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace