CCA 200519052: Railroad employer status depends on separate entity treatment

Number
200519052
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Employers v. Not Employers
Code sections
§ 3231
Ruling dated
January 25, 2005
Publicly released
May 13, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Railroad Retirement Board told the IRS that a redacted business became an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act on a redacted date. Chief Counsel agreed that the business became an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act on that date, assuming it was not disregarded as a separate entity for federal tax purposes. The memorandum does not resolve the separate entity question or describe the business. Counsel asked the IRS processing office to take appropriate action.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the business become an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act?
  • Outcome: Advice: yes, if the business was treated as a separate entity for federal tax purposes.
  • Key authorities: Railroad Retirement Tax Act; IRC § 3231.

Full text (IRS public release)

Office of Chief Counsel

Memorandum
Internal Revenue Service

Number: 200519052
Release Date: 5/13/2005

CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1
POSTN-161619-04
UILC: 3231.01-00

date: January 25, 2005
to: Director, Submission Processing
Cincinnati, OH
Attn: Entity Unit

from: Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel Tax Exempt & Government Entities

subject: Railroad Retirement Tax Act Status

In accordance with the coordination procedure established between the Service and the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), the RRB has provided us with its opinion that the following business became an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act on ----------------:

-----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------

We have reviewed the opinion of the RRB and, based upon the information submitted to us by the RRB, we also conclude that the -------------------------------------------------------------
-------became an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act on ----------------, assuming that it is not disregarded as a separate entity for federal tax purposes. Please take the appropriate action regarding this business.

_____
Janine Cook

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace