PLR 200519013: Wife receives more time to allocate GST exemption to trust gifts

Number
200519013
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inclusion Ratio Defined; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 2513, § 2631, § 2632, § 2642, § 2652, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 19, 2005
Publicly released
May 13, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple made gifts to a family trust over three years and elected to treat each gift as made half by each spouse. Their gift tax returns did not effectively allocate generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption to the trust. After the husband died, a review of the returns uncovered the missing allocations. The IRS gave the wife 60 days from the ruling letter to make allocations for her portions of the gifts on supplemental Forms 709. The trust's GST inclusion ratio would be determined from the date-of-gift values and the amounts she allocated. The ruling addresses the wife's allocations, not a separate allocation of her late husband's exemption.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the wife make late GST exemption allocations for her share of the three years of gifts to the trust?
  • Outcome: Approved, with supplemental Forms 709 due within 60 days.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2632, and 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200519013
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/13/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2642.01-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------
---------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
In Re: CC:PSI:B04
----------------------
PLR-134685-04
Date: JANUARY 19, 2005

LEGEND:

Decedent = --------------------------------------------
Wife = -----------------------------------------------
Estate = -------------------------------------------------------
Trust = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Son = --------------------------
Daughter = ----------------
Date 1 = ----------------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Accounting Firm 1 = ------------------------
Accounting Firm 2 = -----------------------------------------
x = -----------
y = ---------
z = ---------

Dear --------------:

This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 2004, requesting an extension of time under section 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an allocation of Wife’s generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

On Date 1 (during Year 1) Decedent established Trust, an irrevocable trust.

Article 2.01 of Trust provides, in part, that each contribution to Trust is to be divided into separate shares for the lineal descendants of Decedent who are living at

PLR-134685-04
2

the time of such contribution, per stirpes. Each share is to be held as a separate trust; provided, however, that if a separate trust already exists for the benefit of a beneficiary receiving a share of the contribution, such share is to instead augment the existing trust; and provided, further, if at the time a share is created for a lineal descendant of a child of Decedent, such lineal descendant has reached the age for outright withdrawal of part or all of the trust assets, the required notice of withdrawal is to be given to such lineal descendant of Decedent’s child immediately.

Article 2.02 provides that while each trust for a child of Decedent is in existence, the Trustee is to pay all of the net income to Decedent’s child quarter-annually or more often.

Article 2.03 provides that while each trust for a lineal descendant of a child of Decedent is in existence, the Trustee may pay such amounts of net income and principal to such lineal descendant as the Trustee is to determine to be appropriate in accordance with the provisions set forth in Article 3.03. When such lineal descendant has reached age 25, he or she shall be entitled to withdraw one-third of the trust assets; when such lineal descendant has reached age 30, he or she shall be entitled to withdraw one-half of the remaining trust assets; and when such lineal descendant has reached age 35, he or she shall be entitled to withdraw all of the remaining trust assets. Any share of trust assets which such lineal descendant becomes entitled to withdraw shall thereafter be accounted for and held separately from the share of assets not then withdrawable. The Trustee shall provide such lineal descendants with written notice of withdrawal rights within 30 days of the date they come into effect, and such lineal descendant is to exercise his or her withdrawal rights in writing.

Article 2.04 provides, in part, that if a lineal descendant of Decedent dies before becoming entitled to receive all of the assets of the separate trust for such lineal descendant, the beneficiary is to have the power to appoint to such persons (including his or her own estate), in such amounts and in such proportions as the beneficiary is to have provided by specific reference to this general power of appointment in his or her will, the smallest portion of the trust assets remaining at his or her death which, if subject to the general power of appointment, will minimize the aggregate estate and GST taxes. In addition, the beneficiary is to have the power to appoint any trust assets remaining at his or her death that are not subject to the foregoing general power of appointment to one or more of such beneficiary’s lineal descendants, if any, or if there are none, one or more of Decedent’s lineal descendants, in such amounts and proportions as the beneficiary is to have provided in his or her will. Any assets not appointed pursuant to the beneficiary’s general or limited powers of appointment is to be distributed among the beneficiary’s then living lineal descendants, per stirpes.

Article 3.03 provides, in part, that in administering any trust established under this instrument, the Trustee is to take Decedent’s goal to make the lives of Decedent’s children and their lineal descendants more financially secure. To achieve the goal, the Trustee is to exercise his authority to make payments to a beneficiary in such amounts as the Trustee determines to be appropriate to provide for the health, support,

PLR-134685-04
3

maintenance in reasonable comfort, and education of the beneficiary, taking into account the beneficiary’s accustomed manner of living and any other resources of the beneficiary available for such needs.

Article 3.04 provides that if any trust created by Trust is not terminated earlier, it shall terminate 21 years after the death of the last to die of the beneficiaries of any trust administered under the instrument in being at the time of the execution of this instrument. In case of termination under this provision, the remainder of the trust estate is to be distributed and paid over free of trust to the person or persons then eligible to receive the income therefrom, in such amounts and proportions as the Trustee, in the Trustee’s sole discretion, is to determine to approximate Decedent’s intention with regard to the distribution of the trust in question.

In Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3, Decedent and Wife (the Taxpayers) made transfers to Trust. No other transfers have been made to Trust.

Decedent and Wife each filed a Form 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax return (gift tax return), for Year 1, Year 2, and Year

  1. The Taxpayers elected to treat the gifts as made one-half by each spouse under
    section 2513. The Taxpayers retained Accounting Firm 1 to prepare the Year 1 gift tax returns and Accounting Firm 2 (the successor to Accounting Firm 1) to prepare the Year 2 and Year 3 gift tax returns. However, with respect to the Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 gift tax returns, the Taxpayers did not effectively allocate their available GST exemption to the transfer to Trust nor did they attach a Notice of Allocation of GST exemption to their respective returns, and did not otherwise make an effective allocation of GST exemption.

    Decedent died on Date 2. Decedent was survived by Wife, Son, and Daughter.

    After Decedent’s death, Accounting Firm 2 undertook a comprehensive review of
    the Taxpayers’ gift tax returns and GST exemption allocations. At that time, it was discovered that the returns did not comply with all of the technical requirements for making a proper allocation of GST exemption with respect to Trust.

    You have requested an extension of time under section 2642(g) and sections
    301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to make a timely allocation of GST exemption under section 2632 with respect to Wife’s transfers to Trust in Years 1, 2, and 3.

    Section 2501 imposes a tax on the transfer of property by gift by an individual,
    resident or nonresident. Section 2513(a) provides generally that, for gift tax purposes, if the parties consent, a gift made by one spouse to any person other than his or her spouse shall, for gift tax purposes, be considered as made one-half by donor spouse and on-half by his or her spouse.

PLR-134685-04
4

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer (GST), as defined in sections 2611 through 2613, made after October 26, 1986, by a “transferor” to a “skip person.”

Under section 2652(a)(1) and section 26.2652-1(a)(1), generally, the transferor for purposes of the GST tax is the individual with respect to whom the property was last subject to Federal estate or gift tax. Section 2652(a)(2) and section 26.2652-1(a)(4) provide that, if, under section 2513, one-half of a gift is treated as made by an individual and one-half is treated as made by the spouse of the individual, then for purposes of the GST tax, each spouse is treated as the transferor of one-half of the entire value of the property transferred by the donor spouse, regardless of the interest the electing spouse is actually deemed to have transferred under section 2513.

Under section 2602, the amount of the tax impose under section 2601 is equal to the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) provides that the “applicable rate” with respect to any generation-skipping transfer, is the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate multiplied by the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer. Under section 2642(a)(1), in general, the inclusion ratio with respect to any property subject to a generation-skipping transfer is the excess of one over the applicable fraction determined for the trust from which the transfer is made. Under section 2642(a)(2), the applicable fraction with respect to a trust is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of GST exemption under section 2631 allocated to the trust, and the denominator of which is, generally, the value of the property transferred to the trust, with certain specified adjustments.

Under section 2631(a), as in effect for the years at issue in the present case, provided that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $ 1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under section 2631(c)) which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under section 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in section 2642(f), if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or before the date prescribed by section 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made under section 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1) the value of such property for purposes of section 2642(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of section 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of an estate tax inclusion period, on and after the close of such estate tax inclusion period.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall, by regulation,

PLR-134685-04
5

prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in section 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under section 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of this paragraph.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under section 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in section 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in section 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of section 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in sections 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except in subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that, in general, requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2 must be made under the rules of section 301.9100-3.

Under section 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with section 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an election described in section 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in section 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of section 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax

PLR-134685-04
6

professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or to advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and representations made in this case, we conclude that the standards of sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Consequently, an extension of time to make a timely allocation of GST exemption under section 2632 with respect to Wife’s transfers to Trust in Years 1, 2, and 3, in the amount of $x, $y, and $z respectively, is granted until 60 days after the date of this letter. The inclusion ratio of Trust will be determined based on the date of gift values of the property transferred to Trust and the amount of GST exemption allocated with respect to those transfers.

The allocation of GST exemption should be made on supplemental Forms 709 and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to the supplemental Form 709. A copy is enclosed for this purpose.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

_______
Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace