CCA 200518078: Former shortline operator ceased to be a railroad carrier employer

Number
200518078
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Employers v. Not Employers
Code sections
§ 3231
Ruling dated
January 6, 2004
Publicly released
May 6, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Railroad Retirement Board advised the IRS that a business had stopped operating a shortline railroad. Chief Counsel agreed that, as of a redacted date, the business ceased to be an employer as a carrier under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. The memorandum leaves open whether the business might still qualify as an employer under a separate definition in IRC § 3231(a). The Board had suggested it might continue rail car repair work, but had not addressed whether carriers owned or controlled it.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the business remain a railroad carrier employer after it stopped operating a shortline railroad?
  • Outcome: Advice given: carrier employer status ended; possible status under the alternate definition was unresolved.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 3231(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

Office of Chief Counsel

Memorandum
Internal Revenue Service

Number: 200518078
Release Date: 5/6/2005
CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1
POSTN-164274-04

UILC: 3231.01-00
date: January 6, 2004
to: Director, Submission Processing
Cincinnati, OH
Attn: Entity Unit
from: Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt & Government Entities)

subject: Railroad Retirement Tax Act Status

In accordance with the coordination procedure established between the Service and the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), the RRB has provided us with its opinion that the following business ceased to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective -------------------:
----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

We have reviewed the opinion of the RRB, which states that -------------------------------------------------


---------has terminated its operation of --------------------------. Based upon the information submitted to us by the RRB, we also conclude that ------ ceased to be an employer (as a “carrier”) under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA) effective -------------------, since it no longer operates a shortline railroad.1 Please take the appropriate action regarding this business or contact me at (202) 622-6040 if you have any questions.

Joseph W. Spires cc:

1
The Board’s opinion suggests that ------ may continue to perform rail car repair services. Since the RRB’s opinion does not discuss whether ------ is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by carriers, we cannot conclude whether --
------ may be an employer for purposes of the RRTA under the alternate definition of “employer” under § 3231(a) of the Code.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace