CCA 200518076: Business was not a railroad tax employer

Number
200518076
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Employers v. Not Employers
Ruling dated
January 23, 2004
Publicly released
May 6, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Railroad Retirement Board concluded that a business was not an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act or the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, and that its employees' service was not covered under those laws. After reviewing the Board's opinion, Chief Counsel likewise concluded that the business was not an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act and that its employees' service was not covered service under that Act. The released memorandum redacts the business's identity and the underlying facts.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the business an employer, and was its employees' work covered, under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act?
  • Outcome: Advice given: neither employer status nor covered employee service applied.
  • Key authorities: Railroad Retirement Tax Act.

Full text (IRS public release)

Office of Chief Counsel

Memorandum
Internal Revenue Service

Number: 200518076
Release Date: 5/6/2005

CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1
POSTN-164268-04

UILC: 3231.01-00

date: January 23, 2004
to: Director, Submission Processing
Cincinnati, OH
Attn: Entity Unit

from: Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt & Government Entities)

subject: Railroad Retirement Tax Act Status

In accordance with the coordination procedure established between the Service and the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), the RRB has provided us with its opinion that the following business is not an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and service performed by its employees is not covered employee service under the Acts:
----------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
We have reviewed the opinion of the RRB and, based upon the information submitted to us by the RRB, we also conclude that -----------------------------------is not an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and service performed by its employees is not covered employee service under the Act. Please take the appropriate action regarding this business.

Joseph W. Spires cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace