PLR 200518061: Policy transfer between one person's grantor trusts was disregarded

Number
200518061
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Transfer for Consideration
Code sections
§ 101, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 14, 2005
Publicly released
May 6, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer proposed moving a life insurance policy on the taxpayer's life from one grantor trust to another for valuable consideration. The taxpayer was treated as the owner of both trusts' assets for federal income tax purposes. The IRS ruled that the transfer would be disregarded and would not count as a transfer for value under IRC § 101(a)(2). On the facts represented, moving the policy would not change the application of the life insurance proceeds exclusion under § 101(a)(1).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would a policy sale between two grantor trusts of the same person trigger the transfer-for-value rule?
  • Outcome: Approved: the transfer is disregarded for federal income tax purposes.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 101(a); Rev. Rul. 85-13; Treas. Reg. § 1.101-1(b)(4).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200518061
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/6/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 101.01-02
Person To Contact:
-------------------
--------------------, ID No. 50-28415
------------------------
Telephone Number:
-----------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:B04
-
PLR-159502-04
Date
January 14, 2005

Legend

Taxpayer = -------------------
-------------------------

Trust 1 = --------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
------------------------

Trust 2 = --------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

Policy = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------

State = ---------------

Dear ---------------

This is in reply to the ruling request filed by your representative, dated October 26, 2004, and supplementary submissions. The letter requests that we rule with respect to a proposed transfer of a life insurance policy on the life of Taxpayer, under § 101 of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

Taxpayer has represented that Trust 1 and Trust 2 are both grantor trusts of Taxpayer. Taxpayer, Trust 1, and Trust 2 are all calendar year taxpayers. Trust 1 presently holds Policy, a life insurance policy insuring the life of Taxpayer.
PLR-159502-04
2

Taxpayer proposes, for valuable consideration, to transfer Policy from the trustees of Trust 1 to the trustees of Trust 2. Accordingly, the transfer of Policy will be from one of Taxpayer’s grantor trusts to another of Taxpayer’s grantor trusts.

APPLICABLE LAW

Rev. Rul. 85-13, 1985-1 C.B. 184, concludes that if a grantor is treated as the owner of the entire trust, the grantor is considered to be the owner of the trust assets for federal income tax purposes.

Section 101(a)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in §§ 101(a)(2), 101 (d), and 101(f), gross income does not include amounts received under a life insurance contract, if such amounts are paid by reason of the death of the insured.

Section 101(a)(2) provides, generally, that if a life insurance contract, or any interest therein, is transferred for a valuable consideration, the exclusion from gross income provided by § 101(a)(1) is limited to an amount equal to the sum of the actual value of the consideration and the premiums and other amounts subsequently paid by the transferee.

The term “transfer for a valuable consideration” is defined for purposes of § 101(a)(2) in § 1.101-1(b)(4) of the regulations as any absolute transfer for value of a right to receive all or a part of the proceeds of a life insurance policy.

ANALYSIS

Taxpayer has represented that Trust 1 and Trust 2 are grantor trusts of Taxpayer. Thus, Taxpayer is treated for federal income tax purposes as the owner of all of the assets of both trusts. See Rev. Rul. 85-13. Therefore, the proposed transfer of Policy, even though for valuable consideration, will be disregarded for federal income tax purposes, and will not affect the application of § 101(a)(1) to amounts the beneficiaries of the policies will receive upon the death of Taxpayer.

RULING

Based solely on the information submitted and on the representations made, it is held that the transfer of Policy, for a valuable consideration, by the trustees of Trust 1 to the trustees of Trust 2 will be disregarded for federal income tax purposes and is not a transfer for value within the meaning of § 101(a)(2).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

No opinion is expressed or implied concerning any matter of State law.
PLR-159502-04
3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

/S/

Donald J. Drees, Jr.
Acting Chief, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace