PLR 200517027: Taxpayers could revoke accidental election out of installment reporting

Number
200517027
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Election After Revocation; Other
Code sections
§ 453, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 11, 2005
Publicly released
April 29, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Taxpayers sold two properties for promissory notes, but their accountant reported all the gains in the sale year instead of using the installment method. When they discovered the error, they asked to revoke the resulting election out of installment reporting. The IRS found that the request arose from inadvertence, rather than tax avoidance or hindsight, and consented to revocation under IRC § 453(d)(3). The taxpayers could report the gains from both sales under the installment method.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayers revoke their election out of installment reporting for the two property sales?
  • Outcome: Approved: the sales could be reported under the installment method.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 453(d)(3); Treas. Reg. § 15a.453-1(d)(4).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200517027
Release Date: 4/29/2005
Index Number: 453.08-01, 9100.22-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------- ------------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
-
PLR-154743-04
------------------------------------------ Date:
January 11, 2005

Taxpayers = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year A = -------
B = -------------------------------------------------------------
C = ---------------------------------------------------------------
$D = -----------
$E = -----------
Year F = -------
Year G = -------

Dear ----------------------:

This letter refers to your request for a private letter ruling requesting to revoke an election out of the installment method for the sale of certain properties under § 453 of the Internal Revenue Code and § 15a.453-1(d)(4) of the Income Tax Regulations.

In Year A, Taxpayers sold properties B and C to unrelated third parties. As consideration for each of the properties, Taxpayers received a promissory note. For the sale of B, Taxpayers received a note for $D, which is required to be paid in Year F. For property C, Taxpayers received a note for $E, which is required to be paid in Year G. Inadvertently, Taxpayers’ accountant did not report the gain from the sales on the installment method but instead reported all of the gain on Taxpayers’ Year A income tax return. In Year G, Taxpayers first became aware of the error and subsequently requested this ruling.

Section 453(a) provides that income from an installment sale shall be taken into account under the installment method. Section 453(d)(1) provides that § 453(a) shall not apply to any sale if the taxpayer elects not to have § 453(a) apply to the sale.

Section 453(d)(2) provides that, except as otherwise provided by regulations, an election under § 453(d)(1) with respect to a sale may be made only on or before the due date prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing the taxpayer's return for the
PLR-154743-04
2

taxable year in which the sale occurs. Such an election shall be made in the manner prescribed by the regulations.

Section 453(d)(3) provides that an election under § 453(d)(1) with respect to any sale may be revoked only with consent of the Secretary.

Section 15a.453-1(d)(4) states that an election out of the installment method may be revoked only with consent of the Internal Revenue Service. A revocation will not be permitted when one of its purposes is the avoidance of federal taxes, or when the taxable year in which any payment was received is closed.

In this case, the information submitted indicates that Taxpayers’ desire to revoke their election out of the installment method is due to inadvertence rather than hindsight or a purpose of avoiding federal taxes. Accordingly, based on the information submitted, Taxpayers may revoke their election out of the installment method of reporting under
§ 453(d)(3), and report the gains on the sales of B and C on the installment method.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

Robert A. Berkovsky
Branch Chief, Branch 4
(Income Tax & Accounting)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace