PLR 200517006: Trust merger preserves GST exemption and supports S corporation ownership
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An irrevocable trust held stock in a company whose shareholders wanted to elect S corporation status. Its power to make payments to an unrestricted group of charities raised concerns about qualifying as an electing small business trust (ESBT), so its trustees proposed merging it into a new trust with narrower charitable beneficiary terms. Assuming the merger was effective under state law, the IRS ruled that it would preserve the old trust's generation-skipping transfer tax exemption and cause no taxable gift by beneficiaries. It also ruled that the merger would produce no gain or loss and would preserve the transferred assets' tax basis and holding periods. If the trustees made a valid ESBT election, the new trust would qualify as an ESBT immediately after the merger.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What GST, gift, income tax, and ESBT consequences would follow the proposed trust merger?
- Outcome: Approved, subject to state-law effectiveness and a valid ESBT election for that status.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 2601, 2501, 1001, 1015, 1223, 1361(e).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200517006
Release Date: 4/29/2005
Index Number: 1001.00-00, 1015.00-00,
1223.00-00, 1361.03-03,
2501.00-00, 2601.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. ------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------
CC:PSI:B04 – PLR-116226-04
------------------------------------------------- Date:NOVEMBER 22, 2004
---------------------------------
In Re: ----------------------------------------------------
----------------
---------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
------------------------
-
Legend:
Date 1 = --------------------------
Settlor = ------------------------------------
Trust = --------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Granddaughter = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
State = --------------------
Company = -------------------------
Individual 1 = -------------
Individual 2 = ----------------------------
Charity 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charity 2 = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
State = ---------
State Statute = ----------------------------------------------------------- S Trust = ---------------------------------------------------- Grandchild 1 = ---------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-116226-04
-2-
Grandchild 2 = --------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Grandchild 3 = ------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Dear --------------------:
This is in response to a letter dated March 17, 2004, and other correspondence, requesting rulings regarding the income, gift, and generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax consequences of a proposed merger of trusts.
Facts
The facts submitted and representations made are as follows. On Date 1, Settlor created Trust, an irrevocable trust. No additions, actual or constructive, have been made to Trust since September 25, 1985.
Paragraph 2. of Trust provides as follows:
2. During the life of [Granddaughter], the trustees shall pay to [Settlor’s] granddaughter and her descendants from time to time living, or any one or more of them, such part or all of the net income and principal of the trust property, (even though exhausting the trust property) at such time or times and in such equal or unequal proportions among them as the trustees shall decide, considering the needs, best interests and welfare of [Settlor’s] granddaughter and her descendants in that order and as a group, including the desirability of supplementing their respective incomes or assets and all other circumstances and factors the trustees believe pertinent. Any undistributed income shall be accumulated and from time to time added to principal, except that the trustees in any calendar year, if they consider that the payments contemplated above will not be jeopardized, in their sole discretion may pay for such religious, charitable, scientific, literary or educational purpose or purposes as the trustees may select such amounts from the net income which otherwise would have been accumulated as the trustees shall deem advisable, but payments pursuant to this sentence shall not exceed twenty per cent of the total net income from the trust property for such year.
Paragraph 3.(a) and (b) provide that after Granddaughter’s death, the trustees will divide Trust into as many equal separate trusts as there are children of Granddaughter then living or then deceased leaving one or more then living descendants, and a trust will be named for each child of Granddaughter. These trusts will distribute to a beneficiary for whom a trust is named and the beneficiary’s descendants net income and principal under provisions identical to those under
PLR-116226-04
-3-
Paragraph 2. until a beneficiary for whom a trust is named has reached age 35; then the trustees will distribute the remaining trust principal to that beneficiary. Paragraph 3.(c) provides for division and allocation among Settlor’s lineal descendants of any part of a trust not effectively disposed of by the provisions of Paragraph 3.(a) and (b).
Paragraph 4. provides that no property will be retained in trust for more than 21 years after the death of the last to die of all of Settlor’s descendants living on the date of the trust agreement creating Trust, and any trust still retained in trust at the end of that period will be distributed immediately to the beneficiary for whom the trust is named.
Paragraph 7. provides that the trustees will have all the powers and rights enumerated in that paragraph in addition to those vested in them elsewhere in the instrument or by law. Paragraph 18. provides that the laws of State govern Trust. Under State Statute, a trustee has the power “to consolidate 2 or more trusts having substantially similar terms into a single trust.” It is represented that no court or third party approval is required.
Trust does not limit the number of charities to which income may be paid and does not limit those charities to charities described in § 170 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Trust holds stock in Company which is currently taxed as a C corporation. The shareholders of Company want to elect S corporation status for Company. All of Company’s shareholders must be eligible to hold S corporation stock as of the first day of the year in which the election will take effect.
Individual 1 and Individual 2 are currently serving as the trustees of Trusts and are not beneficiaries of Trusts. The trustees want to make an electing small business trust (ESBT) election under § 1361(a) for Trust to qualify Trust as an eligible S corporation shareholder. However, the trustees believe that Trust is not currently eligible to make this election because (1) the discretionary power in the trustees under Trust Agreement to pay up to 20 percent of Trust’s annual income to one or more charities contains no limit on the number of charities, and (2) Trust Agreement does not limit permissible charities to those described in § 170.
Individual 1, in his individual capacity, will create S Trust which contains provisions substantially similar to those of Trust. Upon the creation of S Trust, Individual 1 will fund S Trust with a nominal sum.
The substantive terms of S Trust will differ from those of Trust as follows:
Paragraph 2. of Trust provides as follows:
2. During the life of [Granddaughter], the trustees shall pay to [Settlor’s] granddaughter and her descendants from time to time living, or
PLR-116226-04
-4-
any one or more of them, such part or all of the net income and principal of the trust property, (even though exhausting the trust property) at such time or times and in such equal or unequal proportions among them as the trustees shall decide, considering the needs, best interests and welfare of [Settlor’s] granddaughter and her descendants in that order and as a group, including the desirability of supplementing their respective incomes or assets and all other circumstances and factors the trustees believe pertinent. Any undistributed income shall be accumulated and from time to time added to principal, except that the trustees in any calendar year, if they consider that the payments contemplated above will not be jeopardized, in their sole discretion may pay to such “Designated Charities” as the trustees may select such amounts from the net income which otherwise would have been accumulated as the trustees shall deem advisable, but payments pursuant to this sentence shall not exceed twenty per cent of the total net income from the trust property for such year. The “Designated Charities” to receive any such payment or payments shall be either or both of [Charity 1] or [Charity 2], as selected by the trustees from time to time; except that (a) no payments may be made to any charity that is not a “qualified charity” at the time the payment is made; and (b) any payment made to [Charity 2] must be made to a Donor Advised Fund under such Program with the trustees hereunder as the Advisers as to such Fund. If any Designated Charity is not a qualified charity at any time a payment is to be made, the trustees shall designate irrevocably in a written instrument filed with the trust records a substitute qualified charity as a Designated Charity in its place from that point on. “Qualified Charity” means a charity that is in existence and is described in Section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (or any successor provision).
Paragraph 3.(a) of S Trust provides that any payments of net income to charity from a trust created under Paragraph 3. must be made to or for such “Designated Charities” as defined in Paragraph 2. as the trustees select.
Paragraph 18. of S Trust provides that the laws of State govern S Trust as if S Trust were created on Date 1.
Shortly after S Trust is created, the trustees of Trust will merge Trust into S Trust.
The trustees will execute a Memorandum of Merger to effectuate the merger pursuant to their authority under State Statute. After the merger, all of the assets of Trust, including Trust’s stock in Company, will be owned by S Trust; and Trust will cease to exist.
The current individual beneficiaries of Trust are Granddaughter and her three children, Grandchild 1, Grandchild 2, and Grandchild 3.
PLR-116226-04
-5-
The trustees have requested the following rulings:
1. The merger of Trust into S Trust will not subject the assets of Trust held by S Trust to GST tax under § 2601 by forfeiting the effective date exempt status of those assets.
2. The merger of Trust into S Trust will not result in a transfer by any of the beneficiaries that is subject to gift tax under ' 2501.
3. No gain or loss under § 1001 will be realized by Trust, S Trust, or any beneficiaries of either trust as a result of the merger of Trust into S Trust, and the assets transferred from Trust to S Trust will have the same basis and holding periods under §§ 1015 and 1223 before and after the merger.
4. Immediately after the merger of Trust into S Trust, S Trust will qualify as an ESBT within the meaning of § 1361(e) and will not have as a potential current beneficiary any charity other than those named in S Trust.
Ruling Request #1:
Section 2601 imposes a tax on each generation-skipping transfer made by a transferor to a skip person.
Under ' 1433(a) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the generation-skipping transfer tax is generally applicable to generation-skipping transfers made after October 22, 1986. However, under ' 1433(b)(2)(A) of the Tax Reform Act and ' 26.2601-1(b)(1)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations, the tax does not apply to a transfer from a trust, if the trust was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, and no addition (actual or constructive) was made to the trust after that date. Under ' 26.2601- 1(b)(1)(ii), any trust in existence on September 25, 1985, will be considered irrevocable unless the settlor had a power that would have caused inclusion of the trust in his or her gross estate under '' 2038 or 2042, if the settlor had died on September 25, 1985.
Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i) provides rules for determining when a modification, judicial construction, settlement agreement, or trustee action with respect to a trust that is exempt from the generation-skipping transfer tax will not cause the trust to lose its exempt status. The regulation provides that the rules contained in the paragraph are applicable only for purposes of determining whether an exempt trust retains its exempt status for generation-skipping transfer tax purposes. The rules do not apply in determining, for example, whether the transaction results in a gift subject to gift tax, or may cause the trust to be included in the gross estate of a beneficiary, or may result in the realization of capital gain for purposes of ' 1001.
PLR-116226-04
-6-
Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(D) provides that a modification will not cause an exempt trust to be subject to the provisions of chapter 13, if the modification does not shift a beneficial interest in the trust to any beneficiary who occupies a lower generation (as defined in ' 2651) than the person or persons who held the beneficial interest prior to the modification, and the modification does not extend the time for vesting of any beneficial interest in the trust beyond the period provided for in the original trust. A modification of an exempt trust will result in a shift in beneficial interest to a lower generation beneficiary if the modification can result in either an increase in the amount of a GST transfer or the creation of a new GST transfer. A modification that is administrative in nature that only indirectly increases the amount transferred (for example, by lowering administrative costs or income taxes) will not be considered to shift a beneficial interest in the trust.
Example 6 contained in ' 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(E), considers a situation where, in 1980, Grantor established an irrevocable trust for Grantor's child and the child's issue. In 1983, Grantor's spouse also established a separate irrevocable trust for the benefit of the same child and issue. The terms of the spouse's trust and Grantor's trust are identical. In 2002, the appropriate local court approved the merger of the two trusts into one trust to save administrative costs and enhance the management of the investments. The merger of the two trusts does not shift any beneficial interest in the trust to a beneficiary who occupies a lower generation (as defined in ' 2651) than the person or persons who held the beneficial interest prior to the merger. In addition, the merger does not extend the time for vesting of any beneficial interest in the trust beyond the period provided for in the original trust. Therefore, the trust that resulted from the merger will not be subject to the provisions of chapter 13.
In the present case, Trust was irrevocable on September 25, 1985. It is represented that no additions, actual or constructive, were made to Trust after that date.
The merger of Trust into S Trust Son is substantially similar to the situation described in Example 6 of ' 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(E). S Trust contains substantially the same provisions as Trust, except for limiting the definition of permissible charitable beneficiaries to those described in ' 170(c)(2) and limiting the number and type of charitable beneficiaries. The trustees of S Trust will have the same discretion as they had over Trust to pay or permanently set aside for charities in any year up to 20 percent of S Trust’s income for the year. S Trust will terminate on the same date on which Trust would have terminated. All interests under S Trust will vest on the same date as under Trust. Thus, the merger of Trust into S Trust will not result in a shift of any beneficial interest in the trust assets to any beneficiary who occupies a generation lower than the persons holding the beneficial interests prior to the reorganization and will not extend the time for vesting of any beneficial interest in S Trust beyond the period provided for in Trust.
PLR-116226-04
-7-
Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and the representations made and assuming the transaction is carried out, and is effective, under State law, we rule that the merger of Trust into S Trust will not subject the assets of Trust held by S Trust to GST tax under § 2601 by forfeiting the effective date exempt status of those assets.
Ruling Request #2:
Section 2501 imposes a tax on the transfer of property by gift by an individual.
Section 2511 provides that the tax imposed by ' 2501 applies whether the transfer is in trust or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect and whether the property is real or personal, tangible or intangible.
Section 2512(a) provides that, if a gift is made in property, the value thereof at the date of the gift shall be considered the amount of the gift. Section 2512(b) provides that where property is transferred for less than an adequate consideration in money or money=s worth, then the amount by which the value of the property exceeded the value of the consideration is deemed a gift.
In this case, the terms of Trust and of S Trust are substantially identical (except as noted above). Based on the facts submitted and the representations made and assuming the transaction is carried out, and is effective, under State law, we conclude that the merger of Trust into S Trust will not result in a transfer by any of the beneficiaries that is subject to federal gift tax under ' 2501.
Ruling Request #3:
Section 61(a)(3) provides that gross income includes gains derived from dealings in property and, under ' 61(a)(15), from an interest in a trust.
Section 1001(a) provides that the gain from the sale or other disposition of property shall be the excess of the amount realized therefrom over the adjusted basis provided in ' 1011 for determining gain, and the loss shall be the excess of the adjusted basis provided in ' 1011 for determining loss over the amount realized.
Section 1001(b) states that the amount realized from the sale or other disposition of property shall be the sum of any money received plus the fair market value of the property (other than money) received. Under ' 1001(c), except as otherwise provided in subtitle A, the entire amount of gain or loss, determined under ' 1001, on the sale or exchange of property shall be recognized.
Section 1.1001-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the gain or loss realized from the conversion of property into cash, or from the exchange of property for other property differing materially either in kind or in extent, is treated as income or loss sustained.
PLR-116226-04
-8-
A partition of jointly owned property is not a sale or other disposition of property where the co-owners of the joint property sever their joint interests but do not acquire a new or additional interest as a result of the transaction. Thus, neither gain nor loss is realized on a partition. See Rev. Rul. 56-437, 1956-2 C.B. 507.
Cottage Savings Ass'n v. Commissioner, 499 U.S. 554 (1991), concerns the issue of when a sale or exchange has taken place that results in realization of gain or loss under § 1001. In Cottage Savings, a financial institution exchanged its interests in one group of residential mortgage loans for another lender's interests in a different group of residential mortgage loans. The two groups of mortgages were considered "substantially identical" by the agency that regulated the financial institution.
The Supreme Court of the United States in Cottage Savings, 499 U.S. at 560-61, concluded that § 1.1001-1 reasonably interprets § 1001(a) and stated that an exchange of property gives rise to a realization event under § 1001(a) if the properties exchanged are "materially different." In defining what constitutes a "material difference" for purposes of § 1001(a), the Court stated that properties are "different" in the sense that is "material" to the Code so long as their respective possessors enjoy legal entitlements that are different in kind or extent. Cottage Savings, 499 U.S. at 564-65. The Court held that mortgage loans made to different obligors and secured by different homes did embody distinct legal entitlements, and that the taxpayer realized losses when it exchanged interests in the loans. Cottage Savings, 499 U.S. at 566.
Under State law, the trustee has the power to “consolidate 2 or more trusts having substantially similar terms into a single trust.” See State Statute.
It is consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion in Cottage Savings to find that the interests of the beneficiaries of the S trust will not differ materially from their interests in Trust. In the proposed transaction, Trust will be merged into S Trust in accordance with State law. Except for the changes described above, all other provisions of Trust will remain unchanged. Accordingly, the proposed transaction will not result in a material difference in kind or extent of the legal entitlements enjoyed by the beneficiaries.
Section 1015 provides that the basis in property acquired by a transfer in trust is the same as it would be in the hands of the grantor, with adjustments for gain and loss recognized. The basis in the assets of the S Trust will be determined under § 1015.
Section 1223(2) provides that in determining the period for which the taxpayer has held property however acquired, there shall be included the period for which the property was held by any other person, if under Chapter 1 of the Code such property has, for the purposes of determining gain or loss from a sale or exchange, the same
PLR-116226-04
-9-
basis in whole or in part in the taxpayer's hands as it would have in the hands of such other person.
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made and assuming the transaction is carried out, and is effective, under State law, we conclude that no gain or loss under § 1001 will be realized by Trust, S Trust, or any beneficiaries as a result of the merger of Trust into S Trust, and the assets transferred from Trust to S Trust will have the same basis and holding periods under §§ 1015 and 1223, respectively, before and after the mergers.
Ruling Request #4:
Section 1362(a) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S corporation.
Section 1361(a)(1) defines an “S corporation” as a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the taxable year.
Section 1361(b)(1) provides that the term “small business corporation” means a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and that does not (A) have more than 75 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that, for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), an ESBT may be a shareholder of an S corporation. Section 1361(c)(2)(B)(v) provides that in the case of an ESBT, each potential current beneficiary of such trust shall be treated as a shareholder for purposes of § 1361(b)(1); except that, if for any period there is no potential current beneficiary of such trust, such trust shall be treated as the shareholder during such period.
Section 1361(e)(1)(A) defines a trust as an ESBT if (i) such trust does not have as a beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an estate, (III) an organization described in paragraph (2), (3), (4), or (5) of § 170(c), or (IV) an organization described in § 170(c)(1) which holds a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current beneficiary, (ii) no interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and (iii) an election under § 1361(e) applies to such trust.
Section 1361(e)(1)(B) provides that the term “electing small business trust” shall not include – (i) any qualified subchapter S trust (as defined in § 1361(d)(3)) if an election under § 1361(d)(2) applies to any corporation the stock of which is held by such trust, (ii) any trust exempt from tax under subtitle A of chapter 1, and (iii) any charitable remainder annuity trust or charitable remainder unitrust (as defined in § 664(d)).
PLR-116226-04
- 10 -
Section 1361(e)(2) provides that, for purposes of § 1361(e), the term “potential current beneficiary” means, with respect to any period, any person who at any time during such period is entitled to, or at the discretion of any person may receive, a distribution from the principal or income of the trust.
Section 1.1361-1(m)(4)(i) provides that, in general, for purposes of determining whether a corporation is a small business corporation within the meaning of § 1361(b)(1), each potential current beneficiary of an ESBT generally is treated as a shareholder of the corporation. Subject to the provisions of § 1.1361-1(m)(4), a potential current beneficiary generally is, with respect to any period, any person who at any time during such period is entitled to, or in the discretion of any person may receive, a distribution from the principal or income of the trust. A person is treated as a shareholder of the S corporation at any moment in time when that person is entitled to, or in the discretion of any person may receive a distribution of principal or income of the trust.
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made and assuming the transaction is carried out, and is effective, under State law, we conclude as follows:
Immediately after the merger of Trust into S Trust, if the trustees make a valid ESBT election for S Trust, then S Trust will qualify as an ESBT within the meaning of § 1361(e) and will not have as a potential current beneficiary any charity other than those named in S Trust.
Except as specifically ruled herein, we express no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the proposed merger under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code.
PLR-116226-04
- 11 -
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely yours,
_______
Lorraine E. Gardner
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special
Industries)
Enclosure
Copy for section 6110 purposes
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace