PLR 200516007: Former resident's departure found to lack a tax avoidance purpose
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A long-term U.S. resident gave up lawful permanent resident status. At that time, he was resident and fully subject to income tax in the country of his birth. His net worth exceeded a threshold that, under the law discussed in the ruling, could create a presumption of tax avoidance. The IRS found that he made a complete, good faith ruling request under Notice 98-34. It concluded that he would not be presumed to have left for a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. tax and that tax avoidance was not one of his principal purposes. The ruling did not decide his tax liability for other periods or under other Code provisions.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Was avoiding U.S. tax a principal purpose of the former resident's departure?
- Outcome: Approved: the IRS found no such principal purpose on the submitted facts.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 877(a)(2), 877(c)(1)(B); Notice 98-34.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200516007
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/22/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 877.01-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------
--------------------, ID No. ------------
------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------------
--------------------
------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:BR1
PLR-130380-03
-
Date:
December 14, 2004
Legend
A = ------------------------
Date B = ----------------
Date C = -----------------------
Date D = ------------------
Date E = ---------------------------
Country F = ---------
Year G = ------
Dear ----------------
This is in response to a letter from A’s authorized representative dated B, as supplemented by a letter dated C, requesting a ruling under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code") that A’s loss of long-term resident status did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
A, a long-term resident of the United States within the meaning of section 877(e), relinquished his U.S. lawful permanent resident status ("expatriated") on Date D. A has been a citizen of Country F during his entire life by reason of his birth on Date E in Country F. A became a permanent resident of the United States and obtained his green card in Year G. On the date of A’s expatriation, his net worth exceeded the threshold required under section 877(a)(2).
PLR-130380-03
2
Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be taxed under section 877(b) and section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.
A former citizen or former long-term resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3) if the individual's average income tax liability or the individual's net worth on the date of expatriation exceeds certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A), and 2501(a)(3)(B).
Under Notice 98-34, 1998-2 C.B. 29, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, a former U.S. citizen or former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable threshold will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen or former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because on the date of expatriation, A was a resident and fully liable to income tax in Country F, the country where A was born.
Notice 98-34 requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual's expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. A submitted all the information required by Notice 98-34, including any additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes. It is further concluded that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(2) as having as one of his principal purposes of expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A's U.S. tax liability for taxable periods prior to his loss of permanent resident status or for taxable periods after his loss of permanent resident status under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-130380-03
3
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to A’s representative.
Sincerely,
/s/ M. Grace Fleeman
Senior Counsel
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace