PLR 200513021: Corporation received more time to elect subsidiary treatment

Number
200513021
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Definitions; Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 1361
Ruling dated
December 3, 2004
Publicly released
April 1, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

After two corporations were sold to a new shareholder, one intended to elect qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) treatment for the other. It inadvertently missed the filing deadline. The IRS granted the parent corporation 60 days from the letter's date to file Form 8869, with the election effective on the redacted sale date. The ruling rests on the extension rules in Treasury Regulations §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3. The IRS expressly did not decide whether the parent was a valid S corporation or its subsidiary was a valid QSub.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation file a late QSub election for its subsidiary?
  • Outcome: Approved: 60 additional days to file the election, effective on the redacted date.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1361(b)(3)(B); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-3, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200513021
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/1/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1361.00-00, 1361.05-00,
9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-----------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------
---------------------
------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-154998-04
Date:
December 03, 2004

Legend

X = ------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

X1 = -----------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Company = ----------------------------
------

SH = ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

D1 = --------------------------

D2 = --------------------------

D3 = ----------------------

D4 = ------------------------

Dear ------------------:

This responds to a letter dated October 19, 2004, submitted on behalf of X, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to elect to treat X1 as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) for federal tax purposes.

PLR-154998-04
2

FACTS

According to the information submitted, Company was created, and elected to be treated as an S corporation, on D1. That same day, X1 was created as a wholly owned subsidiary of Company, and an election to be treated as a QSub was filed on its behalf. On D2, Company created X and filed an election to treat X as a QSub. On D3, Company transferred X1 to X, such that X1 was a wholly owned subsidiary of X, and X was a wholly owned subsidiary of Company. On D4, X and X1 were sold to and purchased by SH. SH filed an election to treat X as an S corporation effective D4. X further intended to treat X1 as a QSub effective D4, but inadvertently failed to timely file the appropriate election.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code defines a QSub as a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation, if 100 percent of the stock of the corporation is owned by an S corporation, and the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a QSub.

A taxpayer makes a QSub election with respect to a subsidiary by filing a Form 8869, Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary Election, with the appropriate service center.

Section 1.1361-3(a)(4) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the election will be effective on the date specified on the election form or on the date the election is filed if no date is specified. The effective date specified on the election form cannot be more than two months and 15 days prior to the date of filing and cannot be more than 12 months after the date of filing.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election with a due date prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that X has satisfied the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3. Accordingly, X is granted

PLR-154998-04
3

an extension of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to elect to treat X1 as a QSub, effective D4. The election should be made by filing Form 8869 with the appropriate service center. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is express concerning whether X is a valid S corporation or whether X1 is a valid QSub.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for Section 6110 Purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace