PLR 200512030: IRS denied a pension funding waiver as plan termination loomed

Number
200512030
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412, § 4971
Ruling dated
December 28, 2004
Publicly released
March 25, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company suffering losses and litigating a disputed payment sought a waiver of its pension plan's minimum funding standard. It told the IRS that it had made no plan contributions, including payments that would have been required if the waiver were granted. The funding deficiency had grown, and the company planned to sell itself and eventually terminate the plan. The IRS denied the waiver because it could not reasonably assume the plan would continue if the waiver were granted. It also told the company that excise taxes under IRC § 4971(a) were due on accumulated funding deficiencies and instructed it to file Form 5330.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company receive a minimum funding waiver for its pension plan?
  • Outcome: Denied.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412 (index classification); IRC § 4971(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
200512030
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

DEC 28 2004

[handwritten notation: SE TE/EP/RA:TA2]

Company = [redacted]

This letter constitutes notice that your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the above-named plan for the plan year ending [redacted] has been denied.

The Company is involved in the [redacted]. The
current financial hardship was brought on by a decline in demand for the Company's products, which reflect the general downturn in the [redacted] as a whole. As a result, the Company has suffered substantial losses during the last several years. The Company is also due a substantial receivable from a major [redacted] port for the sale of its lease rights to the port. The port has disputed the amount of the receivable due to the Company, and the matter is currently being litigated.

You were notified in a letter dated August 5, 2003, that your request had been tentatively denied. A conference of right was held on September 22, 2003. At the time, a decision was made to await the outcome of the pending litigation mentioned above.

During a telephone conference with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) on December 10, 2004, you stated that the Company has not made contributions to the plan, including the amortization payments that would be due if a waiver of the minimum funding standard were granted for the plan year ending
[redacted] for the plan years ending [redacted] and [redacted]. The funding deficiency has grown rapidly, and the Company's current plan is to resolve the above-mentioned litigation, begin selling off the Company, and eventually terminate the Plan. Because it is unreasonable to assume that the Plan will continue only if a funding waiver is granted, your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ending [redacted] has been denied.

Page 2 200512030

You should note that excise taxes under section 4971(a) of the Internal Revenue Code are currently due on the accumulated funding deficiencies in the Plan for the Plan years ending [redacted] and [redacted]. You should file a Form 5330 as soon as possible to report and pay the taxes.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in [redacted]; to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in [redacted] and to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact [redacted] at [redacted].

Sincerely yours,

[signature]

Donna M. Prestia, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace