PLR 200510024: S corporation status preserved after transfers to ineligible owners
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation issued stock to a trust that had not made the required electing small business trust election. A shareholder later transferred stock to two IRAs, which also could not hold S corporation stock. The IRS said the trust transfer terminated the S election and the IRA transfers would have done so if it had still been in effect. It treated the terminations as inadvertent under § 1362(f), allowing the corporation to continue as an S corporation from the first transfer if its original election was valid and no other termination occurred. The relief required the trust's trustee to file the ESBT election and the IRA held shares to move to eligible shareholders within 60 days of the letter. The IRS did not decide whether the original S election was valid.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the corporation retain S status despite stock transfers to a non electing trust and two IRAs?
- Outcome: Approved, contingent on the trust election and transfer of the IRA shares within 60 days.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1), 1361(c)(2), 1362(f); Rev. Rul. 92-73.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200510024
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/11/05
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-----------------------------
--------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------
---------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-147913-04
Date:
November 18, 2004
Legend
X = ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
Trust = -------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
IRA1 = -------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
IRA2 = -------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
State = ------------
D1 = -------------------
D2 = --------------------------
D3 = ------------------
Dear -------------:
This responds to a letter dated August 25, 2004, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting inadvertent termination relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
According to the information submitted and representations therein, X incorporated under the laws of State and elected S corporation status effective D1. On D2, X issued
2
PLR-147913-04
shares of its stock to Trust, an ineligible shareholder, thereby terminating X’s S corporation election. On D3, a shareholder of X transferred shares of X’s stock to IRA1 and to IRA2, both ineligible shareholders. These transfers would have terminated X’s S corporation election had it not already terminated on D2.
X represents that at all times it has filed consistently with its belief that it was an S corporation. As soon as X discovered the terminating events, it initiated corrective action in order to once again become a small business corporation. Finally, X and each person who was a shareholder in X agree to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a)(1) defines an S corporation as a small business corporation for which an election under Section 1362(a) is in effect. Section 1361(b)(1) defines “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not (A) have more than 75 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, other than a trust described in Section 1361(c)(2), and other than an organization described in (c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.
Transfer to Trust
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that, for purposes of Section 1361(b)(1)(B), trusts that may be shareholders include an electing small business trust.
Section 1361(e)(1)(A) provides that an “electing small business trust " (ESBT) means any trust if (i) such trust does not have as a beneficiary any person other than an (I) individual, (II) an estate, or (III) an organization described in paragraph (2), (3), (4), or (5) of Section 170(c) or (IV) an organization described in Section 170(c)(1) which holds a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current beneficiary; (ii) no interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and (iii) an election under this subsection applies to such trust.
Transfer to IRA1 and IRA2
Section 1.1361-1(f) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that except as otherwise provided in Section 1.1361-1(e)(1) (related to nominees), Section 1.1361-1(h) (relating to certain trusts), and, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997, Section 1361(c)(6) (relating to certain exempt organizations), a corporation in which any shareholder is a corporation, partnership, or trust does not qualify as a small business corporation.
Rev. Rul. 92-73, 1992-2 C.B. 224, holds that a trust that qualifies as an individual retirement account under Section 408(a) of the Code is not a permitted shareholder of an S corporation under Section 1361.
3
PLR-147913-04
Relief for Inadvertent Termination
Under Section 1362(d)(2), an election to be an S corporation will be terminated whenever the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.
Section 1362(f) provides that a corporation will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary if (1) an election under Section 1362(a) by the corporation was terminated under paragraph (2) or (3) of Section 1362(d), (2) the Secretary determines that the termination was inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the terminating even, steps were taken so that the corporation is once more a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to Section 1362(f), agrees to make any adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to that period.
CONCLUSIONS
Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations set forth above, we conclude that (1) X’s S corporation election was terminated on D2 when it issued shares to Trust which did not properly elect to be treated as an ESBT and (2) had X’s S corporation election not terminated on D2, it would have terminated on D3 when shares of its stock were transferred to IRA1 and IRA2. We also conclude that each of these terminating events constituted “inadvertent termination” within the meaning of Section 1362(f).
Accordingly, we conclude that, pursuant to Section 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D2 and thereafter, assuming X's S corporation election is valid and not otherwise terminated under Section 1362(d).
This ruling is contingent upon the trustee of Trust filing an election to treat Trust as an ESBT with the appropriate service center within sixty days of the date of this letter. In addition, this ruling is contingent upon the transfer of the stock held by IRA1 and IRA2 to eligible shareholders on or before the date which is sixty days after the date of this letter.
Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed on whether X’s original election to be an S corporation was a valid election under Section 1362.
PLR-147913-04
4
This ruling is directly only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that if may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
/s/ David R. Haglund
David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for Section 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace