PLR 200509013: Closed end fund may redeem tendered shares with appreciated securities without recognizing gain

Number
200509013
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Taxable Income of a Regulated Investment Company
Code sections
§ 852, § 311, § 317
Ruling dated
November 17, 2004
Publicly released
March 4, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A closed end regulated investment company proposed future tender offers in which redeeming shareholders could receive portfolio securities instead of cash. The IRS ruled that distributing appreciated stock or other securities on a shareholder's request under the proposed offers would not cause the fund to recognize gain under section 852(b)(6). The fund represented that it would generally distribute a proportional share of its securities and would keep the tax basis of the distributed assets close to their share of the total portfolio. The IRS reasoned that the concerns behind the rule for open end funds also applied to these redemptions and that the described distributions would not shift disproportionate tax deferral to remaining shareholders. It gave no opinion on any foreign currency gain or loss from the transaction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would in kind redemptions in the proposed tender offers trigger gain for the fund?
  • Outcome: Approved: no gain recognition under section 852(b)(6) for the described distributions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 852(b)(6), 311(b), 317(a), 317(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200509013
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 3/4/05
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 852.10-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------
----------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------
---------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:B02
In Re:
PLR-144206-04
-----------------------------
Date:
-------------------------
November 17, 2004

LEGEND:

Fund = ------------------------------------------------------

State = ------------

Country = --------

A = -------

B = -------

x = ----

y = ----

Dear --------------:

This responds to your request for a ruling dated August 11, 2004, and additional correspondence dated September 21st, 2004, submitted on behalf of Fund. Fund requests a ruling that it will not recognize gain under section 852(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 upon the distribution of appreciated property in redemption of shares of Fund upon the demand of a shareholder pursuant to a tender offer.

PLR-144206-04
2

FACTS

Fund is a closed-end management investment company, registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq., as amended (the 1940 Act). Its shares are listed and traded on a major exchange. Fund is organized as a corporation under the laws of State. Fund has qualified and elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) under subchapter M, part I, of the Code. Fund invests in securities of corporations of Country under terms of a license issued by Country (“License”). For a number of years, Fund’s shares have traded at a substantial discount to the net asset value of its portfolio. In an effort to address the market discount at which Fund’s shares trade, Fund recently completed a cash tender offer for x% of its outstanding shares at y% of net asset value, and has committed itself to a program according to which it will initiate two subsequent self-tenders in years A and B (“Program”) if its shares continue to trade at a specified discount to net asset value during a specified measuring period. Although the consideration paid for shares in the initial tender offer was cash, Fund may, under the Program, pay for some or all of the shares redeemed in future tender offers with portfolio securities, rather than cash. The ability to redeem shares with appreciated portfolio securities without recognition of gain at the Fund level would enable Fund to avoid the distribution of a capital gain dividend to non-redeeming shareholders and the resultant depletion of Fund assets. Redemption of shares in kind, rather than in cash, would also entitle Fund to a more favorable classification of the transaction under the terms of the License. Fund has applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for exemptive relief permitting it to conduct tender offers pursuant to the Program. Fund intends to apply to the appropriate regulatory authority of Country to approve the transfer of Country securities to Fund shareholders in redemption of their shares. Pursuant to the terms of the Program, shareholders will have the right to demand to redeem up to x% of Fund=s outstanding shares at a purchase price, paid in kind, equal to y% of net asset value. If any tender offer is oversubscribed, Fund will be required to prorate the number of shares repurchased from participating shareholders. Shareholders redeeming shares pursuant to a tender offer will receive in kind pro rata distributions of portfolio securities, determined as described below, equal to y% of the aggregate net asset value of the shares being redeemed. Fund represents that it will distribute to a shareholder exercising a redemption right a pro rata share of each of the securities held by Fund, except for (a) securities that are subject to restrictions on resale or transfer, such as private placement securities, (b) securities that, if distributed, would be required to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (c) securities issued by entities in countries that restrict or prohibit the holdings of securities by non-residents other than through qualified investment

PLR-144206-04
3

vehicles, or whose distribution would otherwise be contrary to applicable local laws, rules, or regulations, (d) portfolio assets that involve the assumption of contractual obligations, such as derivatives, or that require special trading facilities, or that can only be traded with the counterparty to the transaction, and (e) securities which are not traded on a public securities market and for which quoted bid and ask prices are not available, consistent with the conditions imposed by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) on closed-end funds, such as Fund, in seeking orders to permit in- kind tender offers to limit distributed securities to those with readily available market quotations.

Fund represents that the securities distributed in consideration of the tendered shares will have an aggregate federal income tax basis that, as a percentage of the Fund’s aggregate federal income tax basis in all its assets prior to a tender offer, is no more than 1 percentage point lower than the percentage of the assets that are being distributed by the Fund. For example, if a total of 10% of Fund assets are distributed pursuant to a tender offer, the Fund’s aggregate federal income tax basis in all assets distributed in the tender will equal not less than 9% of the Fund’s aggregate tax basis in all its assets prior to the tender offer.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 311(b) of the Code provides, in general, that if a corporation distributes appreciated property to a shareholder, it recognizes gain as if the property were sold to the distributee at its fair market value. Section 852(b)(6) provides, however, that section 311(b) shall not apply to any distribution by a RIC to which subchapter M, part I applies, if the distribution is in redemption of its stock upon the demand of its shareholder. Section 317(b) defines a redemption as the acquisition of a corporation=s stock, by the corporation, from a shareholder in exchange for property. Section 317(a) defines property as money, securities and any other property, except stock in the corporation making the distribution (or rights to acquire such stock). Section 852(b)(6) does not define the term Aredemption upon demand@ of a shareholder. Elsewhere in the tax law, the term has been read to apply to redemptions of stock in an open-end regulated investment company. Cf. Section 162(k)(2)(B); H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 99-841, 99th Cong., 2d Sess., at 168. Under applicable securities law, an open-end management company is a management company which is offering for sale or has outstanding any redeemable security of which it is the issuer. 15 U.S.C. section 80a-5(a)(1). A redeemable security is defined as any security, other than short-term paper, under the terms of which the holder, upon its presentation to the issuer or to a person designated by the issuer, is entitled (whether absolutely or only out of surplus) to receive approximately his proportionate share of the issuer=s current net assets, or the cash equivalent thereof. 15 U.S.C. section 80a-2(32). Fund is not an open-end fund and does not issue redeemable securities within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the terms of the proposed three tender offers,

PLR-144206-04
4

however, Fund will be authorized to redeem a limited amount of its shares. Were it required to sell assets to meet these redemption requests, Fund, like a similarly situated open-end fund, would be exposed to the market risk of disadvantageous sale prices and to the risk of potential depletion of its holdings. Furthermore, the potential depletion would be even greater than in the case of other funds, because of Country’s license requirements that limit Fund’s ability to repatriate capital. The policy concerns underlying section 852(b)(6) that are applicable to an open-end fund are therefore also applicable to Fund. Fund has represented that it will distribute a pro rata share of each of its securities to a redeeming shareholder (subject to exceptions described above) and that the securities distributed will have an aggregate tax basis that, as a percentage of the Fund=s aggregate tax basis in all its assets prior to the redemption, is no more than 1 percentage point lower than the percentage of the assets that are being distributed by the Fund. The transaction, therefore, will neither defer the recognition of gain to Fund=s nonredeeming shareholders nor permit the disproportionate deferral of tax at Fund=s level. Accordingly, we rule that Fund will not recognize gain under section 852(b)(6) of the Code upon the distribution of stock or other securities in redemption of its shares upon the request of a shareholder pursuant to the proposed tender offer. No opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal income tax consequences of the transaction described in this letter, except as expressly provided. In particular, no opinion is expressed with respect to the tax treatment of any foreign currency gain or loss that may arise from this transaction. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. A copy of this letter should be attached to the federal income tax return of Fund for each taxable year in which it distributes stock or other securities in redemption of its shares upon the request of a shareholder as described in this letter.

Sincerely,

Susan Thompson Baker
SUSAN THOMPSON BAKER
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace