PLR 200508011: Corporation may revoke alternative research credit election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation had elected to calculate its research credit under the alternative incremental research credit rules of IRC § 41(c)(4). It asked for consent to revoke that election before its return was due for a later year. The IRS granted permission to revoke the election for qualified research expenses paid or incurred during that year. The corporation was directed to use the general research credit rule in § 41(a) for that year and succeeding years, unless it made a new alternative election later. The IRS gave no opinion on whether the corporation's claimed expenses qualified for the credit.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the corporation revoke its alternative incremental research credit election?
- Outcome: Approved for the specified year and later years.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 41(a), 41(c)(4).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200508011
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/25/05
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 41.00-00
Person To Contact:
-----------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------
---------------------
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B07
PLR-145855-04
Date: November 15, 2004
Legend
Corporation = --------------------------
----------------------
x = -------
y = --------------------------
Dear ------------------:
This letter responds to your letter, dated August 3, 2004, requesting permission for Corporation to revoke its election under ' 41(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The represented facts are as follows:
Corporation is a calendar year, accrual method taxpayer. In x, Corporation elected to utilize the alternative incremental research credit (AIRC) rules under ' 41(c)(4) to compute its credit for increasing research activities (research credit). Before the due date of its return (including extensions) for the taxable year ending on y, Corporation submitted a request to revoke its election to determine its research credit under the AIRC rules of ' 41(c)(4) for qualified research expenses paid or incurred on or after the taxable year ending on y and all subsequent taxable years.
For taxable years beginning after June 30, 1996, taxpayers may elect to determine their research credit under the AIRC rules of ' 41(c)(4). Section 41(c)(4)(B) provides that any election under ' 41(c)(4)(A) shall apply for the taxable year in which made and all succeeding taxable years unless revoked with the consent of the Secretary.
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we grant permission for Corporation to revoke its election to determine its research credit under the AIRC rules of ' 41(c)(4) for qualified research expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year ending on y. Corporation should compute the research credit for the taxable year
PLR-145855-04
2
ending on y and all succeeding years using the general rule of ' 41(a), provided that Corporation does not make a new election to determine its research credit under the AIRC rules of ' 41(c)(4) in a later year.
Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Further, we express or imply no opinion concerning expenditures Corporation treated as qualified research expenses.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to the taxpayer’s representative. A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda M. Stewart
Senior Counsel, Branch 7
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace