PLR 200507023: Incorrect bank advice leads to extra time for retirement plan rollover

Number
200507023
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Taxability of Beneficiary of Employee's Trust (Time and Manner of Taxation)
Code sections
§ 402, § 414, § 401
Ruling dated
November 23, 2004
Publicly released
February 18, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A former spouse received a retirement plan distribution under a qualified domestic relations order. A bank representative told her she had 90 days to roll it over, but the applicable deadline was 60 days. She tried to make the rollover within the period the bank gave her and requested relief soon after learning that the actual deadline had passed. The IRS waived the 60-day requirement under IRC § 402(c)(3)(B) and gave her 60 days from the ruling letter to complete the rollover. The relief depended on meeting the other rollover requirements and did not cover amounts required to be distributed under § 401(a)(9).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the former spouse complete a late rollover after relying on incorrect deadline advice from a bank?
  • Outcome: Approved: the missed deadline was waived, with 60 days from the ruling to complete the rollover.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 402(c)(3)(B), 402(e)(1), 414(p), 401(a)(9); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

200507023

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

NOV 23 2004

Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00

SE:T:EP:RA:T3

Legend:

Bank A =

Amount D =
Amount E =
Amount F =

Plan X =

Dear

This is in response to a request submitted by you by letter dated August 31, 2004, for a ruling to waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Correspondence dated October 8, 2004, November 4, 2004, and November 8, 2004 supplemented the request.

You have submitted the following facts and representations:

Your former husband was a participant in Plan X. Pursuant to a domestic relations order regarding your marriage dissolution you are the alternate payee under Plan X. The order meets the requirements of a qualified domestic relations order set forth in section 206(d)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and section 414(p) of the Code. Amount E was distributed to you pursuant to the domestic relations order. Amount E represents Amount D (the

200507023

Page 2

amount of the funds to which you were entitled from Plan X under the divorce decree) less approximately 30 percent withheld for income tax purposes. You received Amount D on June 21, 2004. You spoke with a representative from Bank A who told you that you had 90 days to roll over the amount distributed from Plan X. The 60 day period expired on August 20, 2004. On August 26, 2004, you again met with a representative from Bank A who then told you that you only had 60 days to effectuate the rollover and the 60 days had now passed.

Based on the facts and representations, you request that the Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount E, because the failure to waive such requirement would be a hardship and against equity or good conscience.

Section 402(e)(1)(A) provides that, for purposes of subsection (a) and section 72, an alternate payee who is the spouse or former spouse of a participant shall be treated as the distributee of any distribution or payment made to the alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order (as defined in section

414(p))

Section 402(e)(1)(B) of the Code provides that if any amount is paid or distributed to an alternate payee who is the spouse or former spouse of a participant by reason of any qualified domestic relations order (within the meaning of section 414(p)), subsection (c) shall apply to such distribution in the same manner as if the alternate payee were the participant.

Section 402(c) of the Code provides rules governing rollovers of amounts from exempt trusts to eligible retirement plans including IRAs. Code section 402(c)(3)(A) provides that, except as provided in subparagraph (B), paragraph (1) shall not apply to any transfer of a distribution made after the 60th day following the day on which the distributee received the property distributed.

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 402(c) where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after

December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(c)(3)(B) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount

200507023

distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

Page 3

The information presented by you demonstrates that you had intended to effectuate a roll over but that you were misinformed by a representative of Bank A as to the number of days you had to complete the rollover. Furthermore, it shows that you attempted to roll over Amount F into an IRA within the time frame indicated to you by the representative of Bank A. However, such attempt to roll over was outside the requisite 60-day period. The information presented indicates that the reason for the failure to comply with the 60-day requirement was erroneous information that you had received. Finally, this request for a letter ruling was submitted shortly after the 60-day period expired and you discovered that you failed to comply with the requirements of section 402(c) of the Code.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution from Plan X. You are granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to complete the rollover. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such distributions, the amount deposited into an IRA will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 402(c)

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts, if any, that are required to be distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact *** * (ID -
*) at () -**. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.

Sincerely yours,

Frances V. Sloan, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace