CCA 200504032: Frivolous return penalty has no reasonable cause exception

Number
200504032
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Frivolous Income Tax Return
Code sections
§ 6702, § 911
Ruling dated
December 10, 2004
Publicly released
January 28, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

IRS attorneys asked Chief Counsel to reconsider earlier advice about military personnel who claimed the foreign earned income exclusion on returns seeking refunds. They supplied additional facts about possible involvement by return preparers. Chief Counsel reaffirmed that IRC § 6702, the frivolous return penalty provision, has no reasonable cause exception. The advice agreed with the requesting attorneys' proposed handling of the matter. It did not set out a separate analysis of individual taxpayers' circumstances.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does IRC § 6702 provide a reasonable cause exception to the frivolous return penalty?
  • Outcome: Advice that it does not.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6702, 911.

Full text (IRS public release)

Office of Chief Counsel

Memorandum
Internal Revenue Service

Number: 200504032
Release Date: 1/28/2005

CC:PA:APJP:B02
SCAF-119247-04

UILC: 6702.00-00

date: December 10, 2004
to: Marion K. Mortensen
Associate Area Counsel (Salt Lake City)
(Small Business/Self-Employed)
(CC:SB:5:SLC)

from: Ashton P. Trice
Branch Chief, Administrative Provisions & Judicial Practice Division, Branch 2 (Procedure & Administration)
(CC:PA:APJP:B02)

subject: Request for reconsideration of advice on I.R.C. § 6702 and its application to returns by military personnel who claimed a foreign earned income exclusion

This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request that we reconsider our July 27, 2004 advice concerning the review of your draft opinion relating to returns in which the taxpayer is a member of the United States military and inappropriately claimed a foreign earned income exclusion.

This advice may not be used or cited as precedent.

ISSUE

Whether there is a reasonable cause exception to the imposition of the frivolous return penalty under section 6702.

CONCLUSION

No.
SCAF-119247-04
2

FACTS

Your draft opinion involves certain United States military taxpayers who have inappropriately claimed a refund by using Form 2555 (Foreign Earned Income) to claim a foreign earned income exclusion under section 911. This exclusion allows U.S. taxpayers to exclude foreign earned income from taxation in the United States if the taxpayer earned that income for services performed in a foreign country. The taxpayers returns show that the taxpayers are clearly members of the United States military, and, thus, their income is not foreign earned income; however, these taxpayers claimed a refund of withheld taxes, based on the foreign earned income exclusion. Specifically, you asked us to clarify part of our prior analysis regarding any possible reasonable cause exception under section 6702 in light of some additional factual information that was not previously available to us regarding return preparers that may have been involved in the preparation of these returns.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

We have considered the additional factual information that you provided to us.
We agree with your analysis provided in your draft opinion and the request for reconsideration that there is no reasonable cause exception under section 6702. We, therefore, also agree with your proposed handling of this matter.

CASE DEVELOPMENT, HAZARDS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

There are no hazards or other considerations.

This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views.

If you have any further questions, please call (202) 622-4940.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace