PLR 200503025: Spouses receive more time to allocate GST exemptions to trust gift

Number
200503025
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inclusion Ratio; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 2513, § 2631, § 2632, § 2642, § 2652
Ruling dated
October 6, 2004
Publicly released
January 21, 2005

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2005
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple created a trust for their children and grandchildren and treated a later contribution as a split gift. Their accountant prepared gift tax returns but improperly allocated their generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemptions to the trust transfer. After the husband's death, an attorney preparing his estate tax return discovered the problem. The IRS granted the husband's estate and the wife 60 days to file supplemental gift tax returns allocating their exemptions correctly. Under the ruling, those allocations would take effect as of the original transfer date. The IRS did not determine the property's value.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the husband's estate and wife receive an extension to allocate their GST exemptions to the earlier trust transfer?
  • Outcome: Approved: 60 days from the ruling to file supplemental Forms 709.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 2642(g)(1); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200503025
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 01/21/2005
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2642.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------
--------------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------ ---------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B09
In Re:
PLR-157486-03
---------------------------
Date:
October 6, 2004

LEGEND

Husband = --------------------
Wife = ----------------
Date 1 = ----------------
Irrevocable = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust
-------------------------
Trust Company = ----------------------------------------------------------------
Date 2 = -------------------
$a = -----------
Accountant = ---------------
Year 1 = -------
Date 3 = ---------------------
Attorney = ---------------
$b = -----------

Dear ------------:

This is in response to your letter dated September 9, 2003, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make allocations of Husband’s and Wife’s respective generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemptions.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: On Date 1, Husband and Wife created Irrevocable Trust for the benefit of their children and grandchildren. Trust Company was named as trustee of Irrevocable Trust.

Article V of Irrevocable Trust provides, in part, that in each calendar year contributions are made to the trust and until the death of the survivor of Husband and Wife, each child and grandchild of Husband and Wife shall have the right to withdraw an amount not to exceed ten thousand dollars.

PLR-157486-03
2

Article IX provides, generally, that upon the death of the survivor of Husband and Wife, the trust corpus shall be divided into the number of shares necessary to set aside one share for each then living child of Husband and Wife and one share for each deceased child who is survived by then living issue. Each share is to be held as a separate trust.

Article IX, paragraph 2 provides that with respect to each share held in trust for a child of Husband and Wife, the trustee shall pay to such child all of the net income of the trust in quarterly installments. In addition, the trustee shall pay to the child for whom the trust was created so much of the principal of the child’s trust as the trustee, in the trustee’s discretion, deems necessary to meet the health, education, and support needs of the child and the child’s issue.

Article IX, paragraph 3 provides that with regard to a share held for the benefit of a grandchild or a more remote descendant of Husband and Wife, each such shall be held in separate trust until the beneficiary reaches the age of fifty. When the beneficiary reaches the age of fifty, or if the beneficiary has reached the age of fifty at the time of the death of the survivor of Husband and Wife, the beneficiary’s trust shall be distributed outright to him or her.

Article IX, paragraph 4 provides that the trust for each child shall terminate upon the child’s death and the balance of the trust shall be distributed to the child’s then living issue, per stirpes, or, if none, to Husband and Wife’s then living issue, per stirpes. If any part of the trust would otherwise pass to a grandchild or more remote descendant of Husband and Wife who is under the age of fifty, such part shall instead be held in trust in accordance with the provisions of Article IX, paragraph 3.

On Date 2, Husband transferred assets with a value of $a to Irrevocable Trust.
Husband and Wife retained Accountant to prepare their Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns for Year 1. The returns reported the transfer to Irrevocable Trust and reflected Husband’s and Wife’s intention to treat the transfers as being made one-half by each pursuant to § 2513. However, in preparing the returns Accountant improperly allocated Husband’s and Wife’s GST exemptions to the Year 1 transfer to Irrevocable Trust.

Husband died on Date 3. Attorney was retained to prepare the Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return for Husband’s estate. While preparing the Form 706, Attorney discovered that Accountant had improperly allocated Husband’s and Wife’s GST exemptions to the Year 1 transfer to Irrevocable Trust.

Wife and the personal representatives of Husband’s estate now request that an extension of time be granted under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to make allocations of their respective GST exemptions with respect to the Year 1 transfer to Irrevocable Trust equal to the reported gift tax value of that transfer.

PLR-157486-03
3

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation- skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines “applicable rate” as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer. Section 2642(a) provides the method for determining the inclusion ratio.

Section 2631(a) in effect at the time of the transfer provides that for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 that may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor’s lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return. An allocation of GST exemption to a trust is void to the extent the amount allocation exceeds the amount necessary to obtain a zero inclusion ratio with respect to the trust.

Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1), the value of such property for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio shall be its value for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of § 2001(f)(2)), and such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of such transfer.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of § 2642(g)(1), which was enacted into law on June 7, 2001.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

PLR-157486-03
4

Section 2652(a)(2) provides that if, under § 2513, one-half of a gift is treated as made by an individual and one-half of such gift is treated as made by the spouse of such individual, such gift shall be so treated for purposes of chapter 13.

Section 26.2652-1(a)(4) provides that in the case of a transfer with respect to which the donor’s spouse makes an election under § 2513 to treat the gift as made one- half by the spouse, the electing spouse is treated as the transferor of one-half of the entire value of the property transferred by the donor, regardless of the interest the electing spouse is actually deemed to have transferred under § 2513. The donor is treated as the transferor of one-half of the value of the entire property.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a generation-skipping trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

PLR-157486-03
5

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made with respect to the transfer made by Husband and Wife to Irrevocable Trust in Year 1, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, we grant an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter for Husband’s estate and Wife to allocate $b of Husband’s and Wife’s respective GST exemptions to the transfer to Irrevocable Trust in Year 1. The allocations will be effective as of the date of the transfer to Irrevocable Trust.

The allocations of Husband’s and Wife’s GST exemptions should be made on supplemental Forms 709 and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, OH 45999. Copies of this letter should be attached to each supplemental Form 709. Copies are enclosed for this purpose.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express or imply no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code. In addition, we express or imply no opinion regarding the value of the property transferred to Irrevocable Trust.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your taxpayer.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy of letter
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace