PLR 200502033: Late dual consolidated loss filings receive 45-day extension
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2005, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation learned that its Form 7004 request to extend the filing deadline for a consolidated return had not arrived on time. It then determined that related election agreements and annual certifications under the dual consolidated loss rules would also be late. The corporation sought relief before the IRS discovered the missed filings. The IRS found that the regulatory standards for an extension were met and gave it 45 days from the ruling date to file the listed documents. The ruling did not decide whether the corporation was otherwise eligible for the elections or whether particular entities were hybrid entity separate units.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the corporation file its listed election agreements and annual certifications after the original deadline?
- Outcome: Approved: a 45-day extension from the ruling date.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3, 1.1503-2(g)(2).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200502033
Release Date: 01/14/2005
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04
-----------------------
Person To Contact:
-----------------------------
--------------------------, ID No. ----------------
-------------
----------------------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------
---------------------
-----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL – PLR-154587-02
Date:
September 28, 2004
LEGEND
Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Individual = --------------------------
A
CPA Firm = ---------------
Date One = --------------------------
Dear ----------------:
This replies to a letter dated October 3, 2002, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the election agreement described in
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), and to file the annual certification described in § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(vi)(B) for the entities and tax years listed on Exhibit A, which is attached and made a part of this ruling letter. Additional information was submitted in a letter dated January 20, 2004, and in an electronic transmission dated February 18, 2004. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.
Taxpayer filed Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of Time To File Corporation Income Tax Return, in order to extend the time to file Taxpayer’s consolidated group corporation income tax return for the tax year ended on Date One. Later, Taxpayer was notified by the IRS that Form 7004 was not filed by its due date.
2
In re: PLR-154587-02
Taxpayer was concerned that certain elections would be late, including elections under
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), which would have been filed with its tax return by the extended due date. Taxpayer requested Individual A, a partner with CPA Firm, to determine which elections, if any, could be affected by the late receipt of Form 7004 by the IRS, and what protective action, if any, could be taken. Individual A determined that the election agreements required under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), and the annual certifications required under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi) would be late. Taxpayer is requesting relief before the failure to file the election agreements and annual certifications has been discovered by the IRS.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
In the present situation, the election agreement and the annual certification are regulatory elections within the meaning of § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in
§ 301.9100-3(a).
Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies
§ 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 45 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the election agreement described in
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), and to file the annual certification described in § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(vi)(B) for the entities and tax years listed on Exhibit A.
As provided in § 301-9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the election agreements and the annual certifications.
3
In re: PLR-154587-02
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the filing of the election agreements and the annual certifications, as listed on Exhibit A.
No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented. Nor have rulings been requested and none are expressed as to whether annual certifications described in
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) are needed for any entity you have described on Exhibit A as not being a hybrid entity separate unit. Furthermore, no opinion is expressed regarding the accuracy of whether an entity listed on Exhibit A is or is not a hybrid entity separate unit.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to your authorized representatives
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel (International)
By: /s/ Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Attachments
Exhibit A
Copy for 6110 purposes
----------------------------------------------------
-------------
------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
-------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
4
In re: PLR-154587-02
--------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
-------
-------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
-------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
-------
---------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace