PLR 200453017: Couple gets more time to reverse ineligible Roth IRA conversions
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A married couple converted traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs believing their income would fall below the conversion limit. Their modified adjusted gross income exceeded the $100,000 limit, and their CPA discovered the problem while preparing their return. They missed the normal deadline to recharacterize the conversions. The IRS granted relief under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 and gave them 60 days from the letter to move the converted amounts back to traditional IRAs. The relief did not cover later contributions to the Roth IRAs.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the couple receive more time to recharacterize Roth conversions that exceeded the income limit?
- Outcome: Approved; the couple has 60 days from the letter to recharacterize the conversions.
- Key authorities: IRC § 408A(c)(3), (d)(6); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.408A-4, 1.408A-5, 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
200453017
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
OCT 06 2004
UIL No.: 9100.00-00
SE:T:EP:RA:T1
Legend:
Taxpayer A........................................................
Taxpayer B........................................................
IRA T.............................................................
Roth IRA U........................................................
IRA V.............................................................
Roth IRA W........................................................
Company M.........................................................
Sum O.............................................................
Sum P.............................................................
Dear :
This is in response to a letter dated August 31, 2004, in which your authorized representative requests relief under section 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations (the “regulations”) on your behalf. You submitted the following facts and representations in connection with your request.
Taxpayer A maintained an individual retirement arrangement, IRA T, described in section 408 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), with Company M. Taxpayer B, Taxpayer A’s spouse, maintained IRA V, which was also with Company M. In [redacted] Taxpayer A converted IRA T into Roth IRA U, and Taxpayer B converted IRA V into Roth IRA W, with Company M. Taxpayer A’s and Taxpayer B’s modified adjusted gross income as reflected on their Federal Income Tax Return for the year [redacted] exceeded the $100,000 limitation in Code section 408A(c)(3)(B). The amounts converted from IRA T and IRA V were Sum O and Sum P, respectively.
200453017
2
Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B received advice regarding the conversion of their traditional IRAs into Roth IRAs based on the belief that their modified adjusted gross income for [redacted] would not exceed the $100,000.00 limitation. In preparing their [redacted] return, the taxpayers provided their CPA with Forms 5498 reflecting the Roth IRA conversions in [redacted]. It was at this time that their CPA realized their mistake and made this submission on their behalf requesting relief.
Accordingly, based on your submission and the above facts and representations, you request a ruling that pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B be granted an extension to recharacterize their [redacted] Roth IRA conversions back to traditional IRAs.
With respect to your request for relief under section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, Code section 408A(d)(6) and section 1.408A-5 of the Federal Income Tax Regulations (the "I.T. Regulations") provide that, except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, a taxpayer may elect to recharacterize an IRA contribution made to one type of IRA as having originally been made to another type of IRA by making a trustee-to-trustee transfer of the IRA contribution, plus earnings, to the other type of IRA. In a recharacterization, the IRA contribution is treated as having been made to the transferee IRA and not the transferor IRA. Under section 408A(d)(6) and section 1.408A-5, this recharacterization election generally must occur on or before the date prescribed by law, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer's federal income tax returns for the year of contributions.
Section 1.408A-5, Q&A-6 of the I.T. Regulations describes how a taxpayer makes the election to recharacterize the IRA contribution. To recharacterize an amount that has been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA: (1) the taxpayer must notify the Roth IRA trustee of the taxpayer's intent to recharacterize the amount, (2) the taxpayer must provide the trustee (and the transferee trustee, if different from the transferor trustee) with specified information that is sufficient to effect the recharacterization, and (3) the trustee must make the transfer.
Code section 408A(c)(3) provides that an individual with an adjusted gross income (as modified within the meaning of subparagraph (c)(3)(C)) in excess of $100,000 for a taxable year is not permitted to make a qualified rollover contribution to a Roth IRA from an individual retirement plan other than a Roth IRA during that taxable year.
Section 1.408A-4, Q&A-2 of the I.T. Regulations provides that an individual with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $100,000 for a taxable year is not permitted to convert an amount to a Roth IRA during that taxable year. Section 1.408A-4, Q&A-2 further provides that an individual and his spouse must file a joint Federal Tax Return to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, and that the modified adjusted gross income (AGI) subject to the $100,000 limit for a taxable year is the modified AGI derived from the joint return using the couple's combined income.
Sections 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3 of the regulations provide
200453017
3
guidance concerning requests for relief submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) on or after December 31, 1997. Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in his discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of the time fixed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for the making of an election or application for relief in respect of tax under, among others, Subtitle A of the Code.
Section 301.9100-2 of the regulations lists certain elections for which automatic extensions of time to file are granted. Section 301.9100-3 generally provides guidance with respect to the granting of relief with respect to those elections not referenced in section 301.9100-2. The relief requested in this case is not referenced in section 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3 of the regulations provides that applications for relief that fall within section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides sufficient evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)(2)) to establish that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) granting relief would not prejudice the interests of the Government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the regulations provides that a taxpayer will be deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith (i) if its request for section 301.9100-1 relief is filed before the failure to make a timely election is discovered by the Service; (ii) if the taxpayer inadvertently failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii) if the taxpayer failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) the taxpayer reasonably relied upon the written advice of the Service; or (v) the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides that ordinarily the interests of the Government will be treated as prejudiced and that ordinarily the Service will not grant relief when tax years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the statute of limitations before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.
In this case, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B were not eligible to convert their traditional IRAs into Roth IRAs since their combined modified adjusted gross income exceeded $100,000 for [redacted], the year of the conversion. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B failed to recharacterize their Roth IRAs back to traditional IRAs by the time permitted by law. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether they are eligible for relief under the provisions of section 301.9100-3 of the regulations.
Although Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B were ineligible for the [redacted] Roth IRA conversions, they were unaware that they were ineligible at the time they filed their
200453017
4
return and of the need to recharacterize before the due date of their [redacted] return. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B requested relief from the Service prior to the Service discovering their ineligibility. Thus, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B satisfy the requirement of clause (i) of section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the regulations. Accordingly, we rule that, pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B are granted a period not to exceed 60 days from the date of this letter to recharacterize their Roth IRAs back to traditional IRAs. However, this ruling does not apply to any contributions that were made to their Roth IRAs U and W subsequent to the conversions of their traditional IRAs into Roth IRAs.
This letter assumes that the above IRAs qualify under Code section 408 at all relevant times.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Code section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of the letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office.
Should you have any concerns regarding this ruling, please contact
Sincerely yours,
(signed) Carlton A. Watkins
Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter
Notice 437
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace