TAM 200452037: IRS advises abating foundation tax after corrected grant reports

Number
200452037
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Technical Advice Memorandum
IRS subject
Abatement of Private Foundation First Tier Taxes In Certain Cases; Initial 10% Tax on Expenditures; Expenditure Responsibility
Code sections
§ 4962, § 4945, § 501, § 509
Ruling dated
November 22, 2004
Publicly released
December 24, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers IRS technical advice on one taxpayer's case, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It answered an IRS office's question about one taxpayer's case on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation left required expenditure responsibility reports for two groups of grants off its timely filed Form 990-PF. Its new tax adviser discovered the omissions and filed an amended return, but the reports arrived after the extended filing deadline. That made the grants taxable expenditures under section 4945. The foundation then filed Form 4720 reporting excise tax. In this technical advice memorandum, the IRS concluded that the first tier section 4945 tax should be abated under section 4962(a), which provides relief when a taxable event was due to reasonable cause rather than willful neglect and was corrected within the correction period.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the foundation's first tier tax for missing expenditure responsibility reports be abated?
  • Outcome: Advice given: the tax should be abated under section 4962(a).
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4945(h), 4962(a); Treas. Reg. § 53.4945-5(d).

Full text (IRS public release)

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM

November 22, 2004

Number: 200452037
Release Date: 12/24/04
Index Number: 4962.00-00
4945.01-00
4945.04-06

EO Area Manager: ------------------

Taxpayer’s Name: -----------------------------------------------------------

Taxpayer’s Address: --------------------------------------------------------

Taxpayer’s EIN: ----------------

Tax Year Involved: ----------

Legend:

X = ----------------------------------------------------------- C = ------- D = ----------------------------------------------- E = ----------------------------- F = ------------------------- Y = ----------------------------------------- Z = ----------------

Issue:

Whether the section 4945 first tier excise tax imposed on X for its failure to include the required expenditure responsibility reports on its Form 990-PF for fiscal year ended (FYE) - ----------------should be abated as provided in section 4962(a) of the Code.

Facts:

X is exempt from federal income tax as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. X is classified as a private foundation within the meaning of section 509 of the Code. Therefore, X is subject to the provisions of Chapter 42 of the Code (i.e., sections 4941-4948).

2
.

On -----------------------, X made endowment grants to three new related private foundations (the “C grants”). Prior to making the C grants, X sought and received a private letter ruling (“PLR”) approving the grants and advising X of its requirement to exercise expenditure responsibility.

During FYE ---------------, X made a series of grants (program related investments) to D (the “D grants”). Because the grants were made to a non-charitable organization, the grants would be considered taxable expenditures unless X exercised expenditure responsibility as described in section 4945(h) of the Code by filing the reports required by section 53.4945-5(d) of the regulations. In addition, X was required to report on the C grants made the previous fiscal year. Therefore, X’s Form 990-PF for FYE --------------- should have included expenditure responsibility reports covering the D grants and the C grants.

X’s Form 990-PF for FYE ---------------, although timely filed, did not include the required expenditure responsibility reports on the C grants. The Form 990-PF lists the D grants under “program-related investments”, but does not include the required expenditure responsibility reports on the D grants. Form 990-PF for FYE --------------- was prepared by E, and was reviewed and approved by F of Y.

E had been hired as X’s Chief Financial Officer in ----------------------. Prior to working at X, E was president and sole shareholder of a public accounting firm. E’s accounting practice was general in nature and did not specialize in nonprofit or private foundation tax consulting or compliance work.

On ----------------------, Z, X’s new tax advisor, discovered that Form 990-PF for FYE ---- --------------- did not include the expenditure responsibility reports as required by Section 4945(h) of the Code. Z prepared an amended Form 990-PF for FYE --------------- which included the required expenditure responsibility reports for the C grants and the D grants. The amended return was postmarked ---------------------------. Since the required expenditure responsibility reports were not received by the Service on or before the extended due date for the Form 990-PF for FYE ---------------, the C grants and D grants constitute taxable expenditures subject to the excise tax provisions of section 4945 of the Code. Therefore, Form 4720 was required to be filed for FYE ---------------.

X filed Form 4720 for FYE ------------ on ---------------------------, reflecting excise tax of --- ------------- relating to taxable events which occurred in several years. The District analyzed the transactions and information provided in the Form 4720 and concluded that taxable events had occurred in FYE --------------- only, and that, therefore, Form 4720 should have been filed only for FYE --------------- and should have reflected a tax of -------------. X stated in its Form 990-PF for FYE --------------- that the fair market value of all assets at the end of the year was ------------------.

Applicable Law:

3
.

Section 4962(a) of the Code provides that if it is established to the satisfaction of the Secretary that: (1) a taxable event was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, and (2) such event was corrected within the correction period for such event, then any qualified first tier tax imposed with respect to such event (including interest) shall not be assessed and, if assessed, the assessment shall be abated and, if collected, shall be credited or refunded as an overpayment. The section applies to taxable events occurring after December 31, 1984.

Delegation Order No. 237 (Rev. 2), updated October 2, 2000, delegates authority to abate substantial first tier excise tax amounts imposed by Chapter 42 of the Code to the Director, Exempt Organizations. A "substantial qualified first tier excise tax amount" is a sum exceeding $200,000 for all such tax payments or deficiencies (excluding interest, other taxes, and penalties) involving all related parties and transactions arising from chapter 42 taxable events within the statute of limitations as determined by the key district office involved. See IRM 1.2.2.7.10.

Conclusion:

The section 4945 first tier excise tax imposed on X for fiscal year ended (FYE) ---------- ----------------should be abated as provided in section 4962(a) of the Code.

A copy of this technical advice memorandum is to be given to X. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice addressed one taxpayer's case and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace