PLR 200450051: Hospital pension plan receives conditional funding waiver

Number
200450051
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
September 16, 2004
Publicly released
December 10, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A nonprofit hospital experiencing financial hardship received a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for its pension plan. The waived amount was the contribution otherwise needed to bring the plan's funding standard account balance to zero at year end, after amortization payments for earlier waivers. The IRS required collateral acceptable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to secure repayment of this waiver in addition to collateral for prior waivers. The letter says the waiver becomes retroactively void if that condition is not met. It also identifies this as the plan's third waiver and warns that no more than three can be granted in 15 consecutive plan years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the IRS waive the hospital pension plan's minimum funding requirement for the specified year?
  • Outcome: Approved conditionally; failure to provide the required collateral voids the waiver retroactively.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(f); ERISA §§ 303, 304(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00 200450051

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

SEP 16 2004

In re:

Hospital =

This letter constitutes notice that a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard has been granted for the above-named pension plan for the plan year beginning [illegible].

The conditional waiver has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The amount for which the conditional waiver has been granted is the contribution that would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account of the plan to zero as of the end of the plan year (after the payment of amortization payments for any prior waivers).

The Hospital is a voluntary, not-for-profit acute care community hospital, with inpatient beds, skilled nursing beds, a home health agency, an emergency ambulance service, a broad range of ambulatory services, and a rehabilitation unit added in [illegible]. The Hospital’s primary sources of revenues are
[illegible], and other third party payors.

The Hospital is experiencing substantial business hardship as evidenced by negative working capital and net worth for [illegible] and [illegible], and losses from operations in [illegible] and [illegible]. The Hospital believes that its present hardship stems from Medicare cuts implemented in [illegible], which are projected to have a negative bottom line impact of approximately $[illegible] per year.

In order to effect recovery and improvement in the Hospital’s financial position, the Hospital hired an outside consultant to develop a turnaround plan, which will be implemented over the 30 months from [illegible] to [illegible]. The

200450051

Hospital’s cash position has already shown improvement. Key elements of the new plan identified to date include:

• Develop a Medical Staff recruiting and retention plan with their new Medical Director; Complete a major modernization of the Emergency Room, where the majority of their patients form their initial impression of the Hospital (construction scheduled to begin in [illegible]); Expand the inpatient Obstetrics service (re-opened in [illegible]) and Rehabilitation program (added in [illegible]); Strengthen the case management function to reduce length of stay, which will reduce costs, and increase bed availability; Obtain new Radiology and IS systems to increase automation, which produce quality and cost benefits across the entire institution; Explore potential staff reductions identified in certain departments; Obtain one-time $[illegible] cash flow benefit by accelerating collection of patient arrears; and

The Plan was frozen with respect to both the entrance of new participants and benefit accruals on [illegible]. As of [illegible], the current liability funded percentage for the Plan was [illegible]%.

The Hospital previously received conditional waivers for the [illegible] plan year and for the [illegible] plan year. Because recovery prospects are still somewhat questionable, this waiver is granted subject to the following condition.

By [illegible] days from the date of this letter, collateral acceptable to the

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) will be provided to the Plan

to secure the repayment of the [illegible] plan year waiver (in addition to the

collateral provided to secure the sum of the outstanding balances of the
[illegible] and [illegible] plan year waivers).

The Hospital has agreed to this condition. If this condition is not satisfied, this waiver is retroactively null and void.

  • Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA
    which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to other retirement plans maintained by the company to increase the liabilities of those plans, or the establishment of new plans, would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

200450051

Also, please note that this is the third waiver for the Plan. Under section 412(d)(1) of the Code and section 303(a) of ERISA, no more than three waivers may be granted for any 15 consecutive plan years. Thus, the next plan year for which a funding waiver could be considered is the [illegible] plan year.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year beginning [illegible], the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification, in
[illegible] and to your authorized representatives, as provided in a power of attorney (Form 2848) on file with this office (

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact [illegible]. In any correspondence relating to this letter, please refer to SE:T:EP:RA:T:A2 as well.

Sincerely,

Carol D. Gold, Director
Employee Plans

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace