PLR 200449034: Family owned property company denied title holding exemption

Number
200449034
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Title-Holding Company
Code sections
§ 501, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 10, 2004
Publicly released
December 3, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A family owned corporation held land and mineral interests and sought exemption as a title holding company under § 501(c)(2). Its articles allowed business activities beyond holding property and collecting income, and individual heirs owned its shares. The IRS denied exemption because the corporation was not organized exclusively to hold title and turn over its net income to an exempt organization. It also found that ownership by several individuals failed the requirement that a qualifying title holding company be owned or controlled by an exempt organization. The corporation had 30 days to protest the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a family owned corporation holding property and royalty interests qualify as an exempt title holding company?
  • Outcome: Denied exemption under § 501(c)(2).
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(2); Rev. Rul. 58-566; Rev. Rul. 71-544.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E RV I C E
WA S H I N G TO N , D . C . 2 0 2 2 4

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Number: 20449034
Release Date: 12/3/04
SIN – 501.02-00

Date: September 10, 2004
Contact Person:

Identification Number:

Contact Number:

Employer Identification Number:

Legend:

A=
B=

E=
F=
G=
H=
I =
J=

M=

O=

X=
Y=
Z=

x=
y=

Dear -------------:

We have considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an organization described in section 501(c)(2). Based on the information submitted, we have concluded that you do not qualify for exemption under that section. The basis for our conclusion is set forth below.

2

You were incorporated under the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law of the State of X. Article V of your Articles of Incorporation (the Articles) provides your formation as a closely held irrevocable family legacy trust corporation organized as a mutual benefit corporation for purpose of engaging in any lawful business activity described in section 501(c)(25)(A) and certain State X Code sections relating to the membership or beneficiaries of such trust. Article III of the Article authorizes you to have no more than 35 shareholder members, and to issue only one class of membership shares, with two shares issued to each shareholder member, with the total number of outstanding shares in the corporation not exceeding 35.

You have issued a total of ---- shares of stock at $-- par value. You issued -- shares of stock to each of the following heirs of A & B: E, F, G, H, I and J. You indicate that all vested interests of the heirs to you are based on their bloodline ancestry to the decedent whose ancestors were land allotment recipients and enrolled members of the O tribes.

You hold rights and title interests in a -----acre land located in Y in the State of Z, including crude oil, gas, petroleum, kindred substances and other minerals therein (the Property). You were adjudged with rights and interests in the Property pursuant to a court order in the M case. The Property has had a succession of lessees for exploration by several energy companies and you were adjudged successor of interests on several leasing agreements entered into by decedents to various energy company lessees. You estimated a total royalty not to exceed x dollars due as liability by the energy company lessees. So far, you have received royalty payment of y dollars from one lessee and other lessees have yet to settle their accounts.

You state that the Property, or your assets, were “received on assignments from the heirs” of the decedent. In the future, you plan to use such assets to undertake exploration and recovery of archeological significance to the preservation of cultural heritage in Z.

Section 501(c)(2) of the Code provides exemption to corporations organized for the exclusive purposes of holding title to property, collecting income therefrom, and turning over the entire amount thereof, less expenses, to an organization exempt under section 501(a).

Rev. Rul. 58-566, 1958-2 C.B. 261, holds that a corporation will not be considered organized as a holding company within the meaning of section 501(c)(2) of the Code where it has broad powers and business purposes far beyond the scope necessary to a holding company.

Rev. Rul. 71-544, 1971-2 C.B. 227, describes a non-profit organization organized by a group of philanthropists to which they transferred income-producing stocks and securities. The stock of the title-holding corporation is owned by the group of philanthropists. The stock confers no rights on the shareholders to receive dividends or to participate in liquidating distributions. The organization holds title to stocks and securities and at the end of each year turns over its income, less expenses, to an organization exempt under section 501(c)(3) selected by its board of directors. The ruling held that the organization did not qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(2) of the Code because it is not owned or controlled by the exempt organization to which it turns over its income.

3

In our evaluation of the information you submitted, we find that your Articles of Incorporation contain purposes not limited to holding title to property, collecting income therefrom, and turning over the net income to a qualified shareholder. Further, your proposed activities are no limited. Similar to the organization described in Rev. Rul. 58-566, supra, you are not exclusively organized for exemption under section 501(c)(2) of the Code because you have broad purposes beyond the requirements of a holding company described in section 501(c)(2).

Moreover, an organization described in section 501(c)(2) of the Code should be owned by one exempt organization. Your case, however, indicates that your shares of stock are owned by owned by several individuals and not by a single exempt organization. Similar to the organization described in Rev. Rul. 71-544, you fail to meet the requirements for exemption under section 501(c)(2).

Accordingly, you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in section 501(c)(2) of the Code and you must file federal income tax returns.

You have the right to protest this ruling if you believe it is incorrect. To protest, you should submit a statement of your views to this office, with a full explanation of your reasoning. This statement, signed by one of your officers, must be submitted within 30 days from the date of this letter. You also have a right to a conference in this office after your statement is submitted. You must request the conference, if you want one, when you file your protest statement. If you are to be represented by someone who is not one of your officers, that person will need to file a proper power of attorney and otherwise qualify under our Conference and Practices Requirements.

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, this ruling will become final and a copy will be forwarded to the Ohio Tax Exempt and Government Entities (TE/GE) office. Thereafter, any questions about your federal income tax status should be directed to that office, either by calling 877-829-5500 (a toll free number) or sending correspondence to: Internal Revenue Service, TE/GE Customer Service, P.O. Box 2508, Cincinnati, OH 45201.

In the event this ruling becomes final, it will be made available for public inspection under section 6110 of the Code after certain deletions of identifying information are made. For details, see enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose. A copy of this ruling with deletions that we intend to make available for public inspection is attached to Notice 437. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, and do not intend to protest our denial of exempt status, you should follow the instructions in Notice 437.

If you decide to protest this ruling, your protest statement should be sent to the address shown below. If you also disagree with our proposed deletions, you should send your comments on the deletions with your protest statement, and not to the address shown in Notice 437.

4

Internal Revenue Service
TEGE, SE:T:EO:RA:T:3

1111 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20224

If you do not intend to protest this ruling, and if you agree with our proposed deletions as shown in the letter attached to Notice 437, you do not need to take any further action.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Ronald J. Shoemaker

Lois G. Lerner
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings & Agreements

Enclosure
Notice 437

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace