PLR 200444042: Passive holding company is not a business enterprise

Number
200444042
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Excise Taxes on Excess Business Holdings
Code sections
§ 4943, § 512
Ruling dated
August 5, 2004
Publicly released
October 29, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation invested in a holding company formed to hold a non-managing interest in an investment manager. The IRS ruled that the holding company itself was not a business enterprise for purposes of the excess business holdings tax under section 4943. Its limited voting rights did not give it control over the manager or the manager's underlying investments. The foundation's possible excess holdings must instead be measured by its proportionate share of interests in any business enterprises held directly or indirectly through the holding company. The letter does not decide that those underlying interests are free of excess business holdings tax.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is the holding company a business enterprise, and how are the foundation's excess business holdings measured?
  • Outcome: Approved as to the holding company's passive status; look through to underlying business interests.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4943; Treas. Reg. §§ 53.4943-1, 53.4943-10(c).

Full text (IRS public release)

200444042

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

Date: August 5, 2004

UIL: 4943.00-00
4943.03-00

Contact Person:
Identification Number:
Telephone Number:

T:EO:BR1

Legend:
T=
A=
B=

Dear:

This is in reply to your request for a ruling under section 4943 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Facts

T is exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and is a private foundation. T’s trustees (“Trustees”) administers its affairs. T's charitable activities are financed with the returns from its investment portfolio consisting in large part of direct and indirect holdings of publicly traded stocks and securities. T also invests in certain private equity and equity-related securities. Recently, the Trustees acquired an indirect interest in an entity engaged in managing investments.

Description of the Transaction

T's Trustees acquired stock in a newly formed Delaware corporation, A (“Holding Company’).

Some of the other investors in Holding Company (collectively with T, the Investors") are also

private foundations. The Investors formed Holding Company for the sole purpose of making

and holding an investment in B, a limited liability company. Holding Company purchased its

interest in B pursuant to a purchase agreement between Holding Company and B dated (“Purchase Agreement’).

B manages, and acts as the general partner of, underlying private equity investment funds formed as limited partnerships, trusts and limited liability companies (the "Underlying Funds"). The Underlying Funds generally invest in debt and equity securities issued by corporations or partnerships ("Portfolio Companies"). In its capacity as a manager, B receives management fee income from the Underlying Funds and other clients. B makes capital contributions to each Underlying Fund and receives a return on that investment, as well as a disproportionate

200444042

("carried") interest in the profits of each Underlying Fund. Holding Company's interest in B is a non-managing member interest. T states Holding Company and T are not, nor will they be, in control of the management, policies or operations of B.

Holding Company's right to vote with the other members of B is limited to specific cases involving (1) the election, removal, or replacement of B's executive committee in certain narrow circumstances; (2) the sale of substantially all of B's assets or certain significant offers to purchase its interests; (3) B's conversion to a different form of entity; (4) the reduction of aggregate capital account balances below a set floor; and (5) certain amendment provisions. T states Holding Company's voting percentage in B will never exceed 20% and, therefore, Holding Company cannot unilaterally control the outcome of any of the limited B member votes in which Holding Company is permitted to participate.

At present, T states it owns less than 20% of the stock of Holding Company, both by vote and by value. Pursuant to the stockholders’ agreement of Holding Company (the "Stockholders' Agreement," collectively with the Purchase Agreement and the Operating Agreement (the “Agreements"), each of the Investors will have the opportunity to exercise options to acquire additional stock of Holding Company and Holding Company will in turn exercise options to acquire additional interests in B. The exercise of such options could change the voting and ownership percentages in Holding Company if some but not all of the Investors exercise their options or if the options are exercised in differing proportions. In addition, in certain situations, Holding Company may redeem the stock of an Investor, which would result in a change in the voting and ownership percentages of Holding Company. If either of those events occurs, it is possible T could own more than 20% of the stock of the Holding Company.

Law

Section 4943 of the Code imposes a tax on the excess business holdings of a private foundation in a business enterprise.

Section 4943(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides the term "business enterprise" does not include a trade or business at least 95 percent of the gross income of which is derived from passive sources. For purposes of subparagraph (B), gross income from passive sources includes the items excluded by section 512(b)(1), (2), (3), and (5).

Section 53.4943-1 of the Foundation and Similar Excise Tax Regulations provides generally, under section 4943, the combined holdings of a private foundation and all disqualified persons (as defined in section 4946(a)) in any corporation conducting a business which is not substantially related (aside from the need of the foundation for income or funds or the use it makes of the profits derived) to the exempt purposes of the foundation are limited to 20 percent of the voting stock in such corporation. In addition, the combined holdings of a private foundation and all disqualified persons in any unincorporated business (other than a sole proprietorship) which is not substantially related (aside from the need of the foundation for income or funds or the use it makes of the profits derived) to the exempt purposes of such foundation are limited to 20 percent of the beneficial or profits interest in such business.

200444042

Section 53.4943-10(c)(1) of the regulations provides that "stock in a passive holding company is not to be considered a holding in a business enterprise even if the company is controlled by the foundation. Instead, the foundation is treated as owning its proportionate share of any interests in a business enterprise held by such company under section 4943(d)(1)."

Section 53.4943-10(c)(2) of the regulations provides that income classified as passive does not lose its character merely because section 512(b)(4) or 514 (related to debt-financed income) applies to such income.

Rationale

Holding Company will not have control over the management or operations of B, any Underlying Funds, any Portfolio Companies, or any other direct or indirect investments held by B. Holding Company’s assets will consist solely of a limited partnership interest (or non-managing member interests) in B. Thus, Holding Company is a passive holding company, not an operating business. Since Holding Company cannot control or participate in the operations or management of B's business, Holding Company is not treated as a business enterprise for purposes of section 4943 of the Code. Further, T’s interest in Holding Company is the governing factor in determining whether T holds any excess business holding.

Conclusion

We rule as follows:

  1. For purposes of section 4943 of the Code, Holding Company will not be a business
    enterprise.

  2. Whether T holds excess business holdings will be determined by reference to T's
    proportionate share of any interests in a business enterprise (which could include but is not limited to B, any Underlying Fund and/or any Portfolio Company), in which Holding Company holds a direct or indirect interest.

This ruling letter is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

This ruling is based on the understanding there will be no material changes in the facts upon which it is based. Any changes that may have a bearing on your tax status should be reported to the Service. This ruling does not address the applicability of any section of the Code or regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections described.

Please keep a copy of this ruling letter in your permanent records.

200444042

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Michael Seto .
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 1

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace