PLR 200441006: Time extended for dual consolidated loss agreements

Number
200441006
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
June 22, 2004
Publicly released
October 8, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate taxpayer and its accounting firm missed required agreements for dual consolidated losses involving two entities and several tax years. They attributed the omission to staff turnover and a complex return, and the taxpayer's tax director discovered it after attending a seminar. The IRS granted 45 days from the letter date to file the specified agreements. The extension did not establish the taxpayer's underlying eligibility. The IRS expressly gave no opinion on separate missing annual certifications.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer file the dual consolidated loss agreements after their deadlines?
  • Outcome: Approved: 45-day extension for the agreements only.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200441006
Release Date: 10/8/04
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04

---------------------
Person To Contact:
-------------------------
--------------------
---------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
In re: ------------------------------------------ CC:INTL – PLR-109404-03
----------------------------
Date:
----------------------
June 22, 2004

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------
-----------------------

Entity 1 = -------------------------------------------

Entity 2 = ----------------------------------------------

Taxpayer’s Tax Director = ----------------------

CPA Firm = ---------------------------------

Date A = ------------------------

Date B = ----------------------------

Date C = ----------------------------

Date D = ----------------------------

Dear ------------------:

This replies to a letter dated Date A, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file an election and agreement described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2) (the “2(g)(2)(i) agreement”). The election for Entity 1 is for the tax year ended on Date C, and the election for Entity 2 is for the tax years ended on Dates B and C. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below. In re: PLR-109404-03

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

Taxpayer employs CPA Firm to assist with its tax compliance. CPA Firm has represented that due to turnover of personnel in both Taxpayer and CPA Firm’s offices, and the complex and voluminous nature of Taxpayer’s return, CPA Firm and Taxpayer inadvertently failed to submit the 2(g)(2)(i) agreement for Entities 1 and 2 for years ending Dates B and C. Approximately one week after filing for Date C, Taxpayer’s Tax Director attended a seminar at which the topic of dual consolidated losses and the election under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2) were discussed. Consequently, the Tax Director realized the required elections had not been made.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) that establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the agreement described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) is a regulatory election as defined in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we grant Taxpayer an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) to submit its 2(g)(2)(i) agreements for Entity 1 for the tax year ended on Date C and for Entity 2 for the tax years ended on Dates B and C. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 45 days from

2
In re: PLR-109404-03

the date of this ruling to file an agreement described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) for tax years ending Dates B and C.

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the 2(g)(2)(i) agreements. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a).

A copy of this letter ruling should be attached to the 2(g)(2)(i) agreements.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented. Specifically, no opinion is expressed with respect to the fact that the annual certification as described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) was not filed with the tax return for the tax year ended on Date C, and with the tax return for the year ended on Date D with respect to the dual consolidated losses Entity 2 incurred for the years ended on Dates B and C.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to Taxpayer.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel (International)

By: /s/ Allen Goldstein
Al Goldstein
Reviewer

Enclosure:

Copy for 6110 purposes

3

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace