PLR 200431007: Late application to change a corporation's tax year accepted
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An oil and gas corporation wanted to change from a June 30 tax year to a December 31 tax year, effective December 31, 2001. It filed Form 1128 more than 90 days after the deadline because of an error or misunderstanding. The IRS found unusual and compelling circumstances, along with reasonable and prompt action by the taxpayer, and determined that relief would not prejudice the government. It treated the Form 1128 as timely filed under Treasury Regulation section 301.9100-3 and sent it to the service center for processing.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could a Form 1128 filed more than 90 days late be treated as timely for a tax year change?
- Outcome: Approved: the late Form 1128 was treated as timely filed.
- Key authorities: IRC § 442; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.442-1(b), 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-37.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200431007
Release Date: 7/30/04
Index Number: 9100.09-00
---------------------
Person To Contact:
-----------------------------------
-------------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
-----------------------------
---------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:05 – PLR-158878-03
In Re: Date:
------------------------------------------------- April 15, 2004
----------------------
-----------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
EIN: ----------------
Dear -------------:
This is in reference to a Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year, submitted on behalf of the above-named taxpayer requesting permission to change its accounting period, for federal income tax purposes, from a taxable year ending June 30, to a taxable year ending December 31, effective December 31, 2001. The taxpayer has requested that the Form 1128 be considered timely filed under the authority contained in section 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
The information submitted indicates that the taxpayer intended to file Form 1128 on a timely basis. The taxpayer is a domestic corporation and engages in the business of oil and gas exploration and production. The taxpayer uses an accrual method as its overall method of accounting.
Section 442 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that a taxpayer must obtain approval to change its taxable year.
Section 1.442-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that in order to secure the Commissioner's consent to a change in accounting period, the taxpayer must file an application generally on Form 1128 with the Commissioner within such time and in such manner as is provided in the administrative procedures published by the Commissioner. Rev. Proc. 2002-37, 2002-1 C.B. 1030, provides the exclusive procedures for certain corporations to obtain automatic approval to change their accounting period under § 442 of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.442- 1(b). Section 7.02(2) of Rev. Proc. 2002-37 states that a Form 1128 filed pursuant to this revenue procedure will be considered timely filed for purposes of § 1.442-1(b)(1) only if it is filed on or before the due date (including extensions) for filing the federal income tax return
-2-
for the short period required to effect such change. Accordingly, the taxpayer's Form 1128 requesting a change in accounting period to a tax year ending December 31 was due on or before September 15, 2002. Due to an error or misunderstanding, however, the form was not filed until more than 90 days beyond its due date. Submitted information demonstrates that the late filing was not due to any lack of due diligence or prompt action on the part of the taxpayer.
Section 301.9100-3(a) of the regulations provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as the instant case, must be made under the rules of §301.9100-3. Requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted where evidence establishes that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Requests for relief involving a change in accounting period that are filed more than 90 days beyond the due date for filing Form 1128 will be deemed to prejudice the interests of the government, except in unusual and compelling circumstances.
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we have determined that the taxpayer demonstrated unusual and compelling circumstances in respect of this matter. In addition, granting of relief to this taxpayer will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief have been satisfied in this case, and the taxpayer's late filed Form 1128 requesting permission to change from a taxable year ending June 30, to a taxable year ending December 31, effective December 31, 2001, is considered timely filed.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer, and is limited to the filing of Form 1128. Except as specifically addressed herein, no opinion is expressed regarding the tax treatment of the subject transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable thereto. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the requested ruling; verification of factual information, representations, and other data is within the examination jurisdiction of the taxpayer's local district director.
A copy of this letter ruling and the taxpayer's Form 1128 are being forwarded to the service center where the taxpayer files its federal income tax returns with instructions that the Form 1128 be considered timely filed, and processed in accordance with established procedures under Rev. Proc. 2002-37.
In accordance with the provisions of a power of attorney currently on file with this office, the original of this letter ruling is being sent to the taxpayer's authorized representative, and a copy is being sent to the taxpayer.
-3-
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
WILLIAM A. JACKSON
Chief, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace