PLR 200430021: Parent receives extra time for subsidiary stock basis election

Number
200430021
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Regulation Section 1.1502-20; Extension of Time for Making Election; Loss Disallowance Rule
Code sections
§ 1502, § 6501
Ruling dated
April 9, 2004
Publicly released
July 23, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group's subsidiary transferred stock of another subsidiary to a partnership, causing that corporation to leave the group. The parent intended to elect a regulatory method for determining the reduction in basis of the departing subsidiary's stock, but no valid election was filed by the deadline. The IRS found that the parent reasonably relied on a tax professional and that allowing the late election would not prejudice the government. It gave the parent 45 days from the letter's date to make the election on an amended return. The extension was conditioned on the group's aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been with a timely election, taking the time value of money into account.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent file its election under the consolidated return stock basis rule after the deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved; a 45-day extension was granted, subject to the stated tax liability condition.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-20T(i)(4), 1.1502-20T(i)(2)(i), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200430021
Release Date: 7/23/04
Index Number: 9100.28-00, 1502.20-00

----------------------------------------------- Person To Contact:
--------------------------------
-------------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B03 - PLR-169157-03
-
Date:
April 09, 2004

Legend

Parent = ------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Sub 1 = -----------------------------------------------------

Sub 2 = ------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Partnership = ---------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Date A = --------------------------

Date B = ----------------------------

Date C = -------------------------------------------

Company Official = -----------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tax Professionals = ----------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------
PLR-169157-03
2

Dear ------------------

This letter responds to a letter dated November 20, 2003, submitted on behalf of Parent, requesting an extension of time under §301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election. The extension is being requested for Parent to file an election under §1.1502-20T(i)(4) of the Income Tax Regulations to apply the provisions described in §1.1502-20T(i)(2)(i) to determine the basis reduction on the deconsolidation of Sub 2 occurring upon the contribution of its stock to Partnership during the taxable year ending Date A. Additional information was received in letters and/or facsimiles dated February 2, April 1, and April 8, 2004. The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.

Parent is the common parent of a consolidated group. Parent owned all of the stock of Sub 1, which owned all of the stock of Sub 2. During the taxable year ending Date A, Sub 1 contributed its ownership in Sub 2 to Partnership causing a deconsolidation of Sub 2 from Parent’s consolidated group.

Parent intended to file an election, under §1.1502-20T(i)(4), to determine the basis reduction of its interest in Sub 2 on the deconsolidation by applying the provisions described in §1.1502-20T(i)(2)(i). The election was due on Date B, but for various reasons a valid election was not filed. On Date C (which is after Date B), it was discovered that a valid election was not filed. Subsequently, this request was submitted, under §301.9100-3, for an extension of time to file a valid election. The period of limitations on assessment under §6501(a) has not expired for the taxable year for which the election should have been filed or for any subsequent taxable year.

Section 1.1502-20(b)(1) provides that if a member’s basis in a share of stock of a subsidiary exceeds its value immediately before a deconsolidation of the share, the basis of the share is reduced at that time to an amount equal to its value.

Section 1.1502-20(c)(1) provides that the amount of basis reduction under §1.1502-20(b)(1) with respect to a share of stock shall not exceed the sum of the amounts described in §1.1502-20(c)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii).

Section 1.1502-20T(i)(2)(i) provides that in the case of a disposition of stock of a subsidiary before March 7, 2002, a consolidated group may determine the basis reduction by making an election to apply the provisions of §1.1502-20, except that in applying §1.1502-20(c)(1), the amount of loss disallowed under §1.1502-20(a)(1) and the amount of basis reduction under §1.1502-20(b)(1) with respect to a share of stock will not exceed the sum of the amounts described in §1.1502-20(c)(1)(i) and (ii).

Section 1.1502-20T(i)(4) of the regulations provides, in general, that for dispositions of stock on or before March 7, 2002, an election to determine allowable loss or basis reduction by applying the provisions described in §1.1502-20T(i)(2)(i) or (ii) is made by including the statement described in §1.1502-20T(i)(4) with or as part of any
PLR-169157-03
3

timely filed (including any extensions) original return for a taxable year that includes any date on or before March 7, 2002, or with or as part of an amended return filed before the date the original return for the taxable year that includes March 7, 2002, is due (including any extensions).

Under §301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of §301.9100-2. Requests for relief under §301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

In this case, the time for filing the election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., §1.1502-20T(i)(4). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under §301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the election, provided Parent establishes it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent, Company Official, and Tax Professionals explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file a valid election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, the election, and that the interests of the government will not be prejudiced if relief is granted. See §301.9100-3(b)(1)(v).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations that have been made, we conclude that Parent has established it acted reasonably and in good faith in failing to timely file the election, the requirements §§301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, we grant an extension of time under §301.9100-3, until 45 days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the election described in §1.1502- 20T(i)(4) to apply the provisions described in §1.1502-20T(i)(2)(i). The election shall be made on an amended return for its tax year ending Date A. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election statement.

The above extension of time is conditioned on Parent’s consolidated group’s tax liability, if any, not being lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the election applies, than it would have been if the election had been made timely (taking into
PLR-169157-03
4

account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to Parent’s consolidated group’s tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made upon audit of the federal income tax returns involved. Further, no opinion is expressed as to the Federal income tax effect, if any, if it is determined that Parent’s consolidated group’s tax liability is lower. Section 301.9100-3(c).

No opinion is expressed as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code and regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or resulting from, filing the election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling. For purposes of granting relief under §301.9100-3, we relied on certain statements and representations made by the taxpayer and its representatives. However, all of the essential facts must be verified. In addition, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under §301.9100-3 to file the election, penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable, if any, continue to apply.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

_____
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace