PLR 200423031: Late plan rollover accepted after deadline misunderstanding
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A former employee moved part of a distribution from one qualified employer plan into another about 86 days after receiving it. He believed the rollover deadline was 90 days because an earlier rollover had been completed within 60 days without correcting that belief. The IRS found his mistake about the deadline reasonable and waived the 60 day requirement under section 402(c)(3)(B). It treated the August 15, 2003 transfer as timely, provided the other rollover requirements were met.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can a plan to plan rollover made after 60 days be treated as timely when the taxpayer reasonably believed the deadline was 90 days?
- Outcome: Approved: the completed transfer was deemed timely, subject to the other rollover rules.
- Key authorities: IRC § 402(c)(3)(B); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
200423031
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
MAR 09 2004
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
SE:T:EP:RA:T3
Legend:
Taxpayer A =
Amount D =
Amount E =
Employer C =
Employer M =
Plan X =
Plan Z=
Dear
This is in response to your letter dated October 8, 2003, as supplemented by correspondence dated February 5, 2004, in which you requested a waiver of the 60-day
rollover requirement contained in section 402(C)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested:
Employer C maintained Plan X, a plan qualified within the meaning of Code section 401(a) which contains a Code section 401(k) cash or deferred arrangement (CODA).
Taxpayer A left Employer C and received a distribution of Amount D from Plan X on May 21, 2003. On August 15, 2003, Taxpayer A rolled over Amount E, a portion of
200423031
2
Amount D, into Plan Z, a plan qualified within the meaning of Code section 401(a) sponsored by Employer M.
Taxpayer A was subsequently informed by his financial advisor that the rollover of Amount E was beyond the 60-day period allowed for a rollover.
Taxpayer A represents that he was misinformed about the 60-day rule because of a prior timely rollover event. In the prior event, although he completed the rollover transaction within the required 60 days, he operated under the belief that the correct rollover period was 90 days instead of 60 days.
Based on the facts and representations, you request that the Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount E because the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience.
With respect to your request to waive to 60 day rollover requirement, section 402(a)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 402, any amount distributed out of an employees' trust described in section 401(a) that is exempt from tax under section 501(a) shall be taxable to the distributee, in the taxable year of the distributee in which distributed, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code (relating to annuities).
Section 402(c) of the Code provides rules governing rollovers of amounts from exempt trusts to eligible retirement plans including IRAs. Code section 402(c)(3)(A) provides that, except as provided in subparagraph (B), paragraph (1) shall not apply to any transfer of a distribution made after the 60th day following the day on which the distributee received the property distributed.
Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c)(3)(A) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.
Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment
by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
200423031
The information presented by Taxpayer A demonstrates a mistake on the part of Taxpayer A resulting from his misunderstanding about the 60-day rule. Thus the facts surrounding this request indicate that Taxpayer A mistakenly believed that all of the
rollover requirements including the timeliness requirement had been satisfied, and that his mistake was reasonable.
Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount E.
Thus, Taxpayer A is deemed to have made a timely rollover of Amount E into Plan Z on August 15, 2003. Provided all other requirements of § 402(c) of the Code were met with respect to said August 15, 2003, transaction, Amount E will be considered a rollover contribution to Plan Z satisfying the requirements of Code § 402(c).
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact . at Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.
Sincerely yours,
Frances V. Sloan, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace