PLR 200423012: Former affiliated-company secretary qualifies as outside director

Number
200423012
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Outside Directors
Code sections
§ 162
Ruling dated
January 14, 2004
Publicly released
June 4, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A director of a surviving corporation had previously served as secretary and board member of a related corporation that merged into it. The director received no payment from the surviving corporation outside director service. For the performance-based compensation rule under section 162(m), the IRS ruled that the person qualified as an outside director of the surviving corporation. The regulation evaluates past officer status using the facts when the person serves on the compensation committee and does not automatically disqualify a former officer of an affiliated corporation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did prior service as secretary of the merged affiliate prevent outside director status?
  • Outcome: Approved: the director qualified on the represented facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 162(m)(4)(C); Treas. Reg. § 1.162-27(e)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200423012
Release Date: 6/4/04
Index Number: 162.36-05

-----------------------------
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------
-----------------------
----------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
---------------------
-------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:TEGE:EB:EC – PLR-142861-03
Date:
-
January 14, 2004

Corporation X = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Corporation Y = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Director = -------------------------
State X = ------------
State Y = ------
Year a = -------
Year b = -------
Year c = -------
Year d = -------

Dear
:
---------------------

This responds to your letter dated June 10, 2003, requesting a ruling under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Specifically, a ruling is requested that Director qualifies as an “outside director” for purposes section 1.162- 27(e)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations (“regulations”). The facts, as represented by Corporation X, are as follows.

Corporation Y, a State Y corporation, was incorporated in Year a. Director served as secretary of Corporation Y from Year a to Year c. As secretary, Director
PLR-142861-03
2

attended meetings of Corporation Y’s board of directors and, on two occasions in Year a and Year b, Director chaired the board meetings because the president of Corporation Y was unable to attend. Director served as a member of the board of directors of Corporation Y from Year a to Year d.

In Year d, Corporation Y merged into Corporation X, a State X corporation.
Corporation X survived the merger. Corporation X was a newly formed subsidiary of Corporation Y at the time the merger occurred.

Director currently serves on the board of directors of Corporation X. Director receives no remuneration from Corporation X except in his capacity as a director.

Section 162(m)(1) of the Code generally provides a limit of $1 million on the deduction for compensation paid during any taxable year for the Chief Executive Officer and the other four highest compensated officers of any publicly held corporation.

Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code excepts from this limitation certain “performance based compensation” payable solely on account of the attainment of one or more performance goals if, among other requirements, the performance goals are determined by a compensation committee of the board of directors comprised solely of two or more “outside directors.”

Section 1.162-27(e)(3)(i) of the regulations provides that a director is an “outside director” if the director (A) is not a current employee of the publicly held corporation; (B) is not a former employee of the publicly held corporation who receives compensation for prior services (other than benefits under a tax qualified retirement plan) during the taxable year; (C) has not been an officer of the publicly held corporation; and (D) does not receive remuneration from the publicly held corporation, either directly or indirectly, in any capacity other than as a director. For this purpose, remuneration includes any payment in exchange for goods or services.

Section 1.162-27(e)(3)(vi) of the regulations provides that whether a director is an employee or a former officer is determined on the basis of the facts at the time that the individual is serving as a director on the compensation committee. Thus, a director is not precluded from being an outside director solely because the director is a former officer of a corporation that previously was an affiliated corporation of the publicly held corporation. For example, a director of a parent corporation of an affiliated group is not precluded from being an outside director solely because that director is a former officer of an affiliated subsidiary that was spun off or liquidated.

Based on the information submitted, we rule that: Director qualifies as an “outside director” of Corporation X for purposes of section 1.162-27(e)(3) of the regulations.
PLR-142861-03
3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Except as specifically ruled on above, no opinion is expressed as to the federal tax consequences of the transaction described above under any other provision of the Code.

Sincerely,

Kenneth M. Griffin
Assistant Chief
Executive Compensation Branch
Office of Division Counsel/Associate

Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
Government Entities)

Enclosure:
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace